Making more tests, I run into another problem
UIDE (8-3--2009) + LBACACHE don't like each other...
if I load both and run RAWSPEED, I get several *write errors* from LbaCache
LBACACHE flush: write error.FF80/CHS#1212
Also, with both loaded, performance is 15% slower.
with XDMA (V3.3 2-15-2006)
Alain Mouette wrote:
Making more tests, I run into another problem
UIDE (8-3--2009) + LBACACHE don't like each other...
Latest UIDE is 2009-11-27. You can get it from
http://johnson.tmfc.net/dos/driver.html.
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-software.de/
Thanks, I just tested the new version 11-27-2009
THE ERROR IS GONE :) :) :)
but performance is still bad.
With XDMA: write: 19 read: 34 Mb/s
With UIDE: write: 14 read: 19 Mb/s
Alain
Robert Riebisch escreveu:
Alain Mouette wrote:
Making more tests, I run into another problem
UIDE
I just found the cause for the low performance.
After some talk with Eric and explanations from Jack, the problem is simple.
I was WRONG: I loaded UIDE with cache *and* LBACACHE at the same time.
Of course this is slow.
I tested many cambinations, and except for thet one, all others have
good
Hi Alain,
JEMMEX crashes XMSDSK, so it could crash other programs and I did no
further test.
I often use both together without issues. Maybe you could report the bug
that you experience? When did you test JemmEx?
Regards,
Christian
Ah, I forgot to report of one...
SUBST is working fine, all past problems seem to have been fixed.
Alain
Alain Mouette escreveu:
Hi all,
I am making a new version of my mini FreeDOS distro, so I put togheter
all latest versions. Here is What I Get:
KERNEL svn1500 is plain *marvelous*.
I used yesterday JEMMEX 7.52 it this way:
Config.sys:
device=c:\dos\jemmex.exe NOEMS X=TEST
Autoexec.bat:
XMSDSK 4 v: /C2 /T /Y
And XMSDSK just crashes and the system halts... only phisical reset works
The only thing that I have to say is that this is a just a little
problematic MB. I
Hi all,
I am making a new version of my mini FreeDOS distro, so I put togheter
all latest versions. Here is What I Get:
KERNEL svn1500 is plain *marvelous*. When my program crashes (with many
database files open) it no longer looses anything, I only get a few lost
clusters. (this did not
