Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: Re: Re: EMM386 diff donation...

2005-02-17 Thread Michael Devore
At 10:37 PM 2/16/2005 +0100, Bernd Blaauw wrote: Michael, is there some small list or something of apps using EMS, VCPI, DPMI, etc? I only have used Raptor: Call of the Shadows in the past (bought full version for $10 or so a few years ago, DPMI), Warlords II Deluxe (uses EMS), MSCDEX with /E

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: Re: Re: EMM386 diff donation...

2005-02-17 Thread Alain
Michael Devore escreveu: Still using EMS would be a relatively small list. Agreed Old Clipper-compiled database programs that were never later updated to use DOS extenders may well lead the list. And the list is mostly the old 3.2 EMS standard which EMM386 has supported forever. Agreed too.

[Freedos-devel] Re: Re: Re: EMM386 diff donation...

2005-02-16 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Tom, Michael, not giving up on that one yet... Michael wrote: On another front, it appears that Tom Ehlert has rejected the idea of MONOUMB and VGAUMB options. As you may know, he has the overriding vote in what gets added to EMM386... Tom wrote: I have seen VGA/EGA BIOS's that will

[Freedos-devel] Re: Re: Re: EMM386 diff donation...

2005-02-15 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Tom, UMB as (mode) is already used. The only test which you cannot do is the one for mono and pre-EGA graphics cards being present. I think I can find a test PC for that as soon as EMM386 has MONOUMB and VGAUMB ;-). what would be the difference between MONOUMB and /I=b000-b7ff or

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: Re: Re: EMM386 diff donation...

2005-02-15 Thread tom ehlert
Hello Eric, UMB as (mode) is already used. The only test which you cannot do is the one for mono and pre-EGA graphics cards being present. I think I can find a test PC for that as soon as EMM386 has MONOUMB and VGAUMB ;-). what would be the difference between MONOUMB and /I=b000-b7ff