Re: [Freedos-devel] Recent Bugzilla entries

2004-04-20 Thread Steffen Kaiser
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Bernd Blaauw wrote: Hello Bernd, when you have issues about FreeCOM, please, file them at bugzilla or mail them directly to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]); I'm likely to miss them in huge mails compiled of many different topics. It is also helpful to mention something eye catching

[Freedos-devel] Recent Bugzilla entries

2004-04-19 Thread Eric Auer
Hi, as FreeDOS 2034 is out, does it make attempts to fix http://www.freedos.org/bugs/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1745 ? renaming dir with trailing backslash makes it vanish which could be blamed on shell, kernel or both? How about Netware related bug 1753, as reported by Erwin, does 2034 fix it?

Re: [Freedos-devel] Recent Bugzilla entries

2004-04-19 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Eric Auer wrote: Hi, as FreeDOS 2034 is out, does it make attempts to fix http://www.freedos.org/bugs/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1745 ? renaming dir with trailing backslash makes it vanish which could be blamed on shell, kernel or both? [...] Eric, anyone can look through

Re: Re: [Freedos-devel] Recent Bugzilla entries

2004-04-19 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Eric Auer wrote: Hi, I could check SOME of the problems, but I assume that you already KNOW which of them you have addressed and can give a comment about that question on the list first. Don't assume. Any comments will end up in Bugzilla itself. If there aren't any it

Re: [Freedos-devel] Recent Bugzilla entries

2004-04-19 Thread Bernd Blaauw
I already have a wishlist which can easily turn into a errata-list, including reproduction tools/batchfiles. my bugs are mainly trivial enhancements (don't mean trivial code changes, btw), so it can wait. I too like Bugzilla to be as empty as possible, but that means me posting patches and I'm not

Re: [Freedos-devel] Recent Bugzilla entries

2004-04-19 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 19--2004 15:13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: EA In bug 1759, he also suggests that No UMBs available warning (when you EA use DEVICEHIGH) should be only displayed once - fixed in 2034? On the other side, this once warning may be missed - for example, because