Hi,
I updated the source in SVN and the binary at
http://dosemu.org/bart/kernel.sys with your bug (below) fixed.
Thanks for the report.
I made 4 adjustments:
1. If there is no FSINFO sector, don't use it.
2. Range check the FSINFO values to make sure they are usable (that
fixes the bug -- the DPB
Hi!
>> in fact the SVN kernel was fixed 10 days ago (I saw the bug somewhere
>> else) but the binary at http://dosemu.org/bart/kernel.sys
>> was not. I uploaded a new binary now
>
> Result: http://jafile.com/uploads/dos386/fdkernsh.png
>
> NOT fixed:
>>> Kernel mirrored here: http://jafile.com
Kernel mirrored here: http://jafile.com/uploads/dos386/kernel.sys
Silly stuff: http://jafile.com/uploads/dos386/freedos7.png
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authori
> in fact the SVN kernel was fixed 10 days ago (I saw the bug somewhere
> else) but the binary at http://dosemu.org/bart/kernel.sys
> was not. I uploaded a new binary now
Result: http://jafile.com/uploads/dos386/fdkernsh.png
NOT fixed:
* minor "can't-save-after-FSINFO-invalidation-BUG"
0. Get F
Hi,
2011/5/19 Ladislav Lacina :
>
> Yes, I like the FPC 1.0.10. The IDE is a little bit unstable and there are
> bugs in Ansistrings and sometimes failing type control but all important
> components work.
Well, Marcov is a bit less tolerant of it than you (inline asm and
calling convention bugs
> Thanks for the explanation, esp. since Laaca really loves his
> oldy-moldy FPC 1.0.10. ;-)(Laaca, is latest FPC still not as
> good? You'd know better than me, but I thought most regressions were
> fixed by now, not to mention copious improvements.) Well, I guess I'll
> just quote your site
On 19 May 2011 06:50, Rugxulo wrote:
> But honestly, this is a weird bug, surely LD itself (from GNU) didn't
> explicitly do this, did it? (I mean, why would it?) Mustn't it be a
> DJGPP libc bug? But 2.9.1 is old old old (latest is 2.21 !!) from May
> 1998, apparently, which would've been DJGPP 2
Hi,
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Bart Oldeman
wrote:
> On 18 May 2011 11:04, Ladislav Lacina wrote:
>
>> I found severe incompatibility between new SVN kernel 2040 and LD.EXE in
>> version 2.9.1.
>> LD.EXE is part of DJGPP or Freepascal.
>> It is not able to create output file when linking.
On 18 May 2011 11:04, Ladislav Lacina wrote:
> I found severe incompatibility between new SVN kernel 2040 and LD.EXE in
> version 2.9.1.
> LD.EXE is part of DJGPP or Freepascal.
> It is not able to create output file when linking. First symptom I faced was
> that Freepascal 1.0.10 does not more
I found severe incompatibility between new SVN kernel 2040 and LD.EXE in
version 2.9.1.
LD.EXE is part of DJGPP or Freepascal.
It is not able to create output file when linking. First symptom I faced was
that Freepascal 1.0.10 does not more compile any files (end with message "error
in linking")
10 matches
Mail list logo
