Adam Peart wrote:
It also doesn't work under VMware. What ever detects the cpu thinks
But it works for me with qemu 8.0.2 on Windows 2000.
that the cpu is a 801586, and doesn't get corrected to 80386, so it
Maybe that '801586' is the problem. Probably it should be '80586'?!
I didn't find
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:04, Robert Riebisch wrote:
Adam Peart wrote:
snip
that the cpu is a 801586, and doesn't get corrected to 80386, so it
Maybe that '801586' is the problem. Probably it should be '80586'?!
There are no 801586 CPUs. It looks like something's trying to cover all bases
-
Wesley Parish wrote:
Maybe that '801586' is the problem. Probably it should be '80586'?!
There are no 801586 CPUs. It looks like something's trying to cover all bases
- ie, 80186 - 80586, and failing miserably at it.
Where did I say, that 801586 CPUs exist?
Just my 0.02c.
Sorry, but
I'll just send the relevant part of the file.
snip
for %%x in ( 4 5 6 ) do if %cputype%==80%%x86 set cputype=80386
/snip
snip
if %cputype%== set cputype=80386
goto s4_%cputype%
:s4_80186
:s4_80286
:s4_80386
/snip
When I change the top line to the following, it works fine.
for %%x in ( 4 5 6
: There are no 801586 CPUs. It looks like something's trying to cover all
bases
: - ie, 80186 - 80586, and failing miserably at it.
Pentium IVs report themselves as 801586s - see the Linux 2.2.18
announcement at http://lkml.org/lkml/2000/12/11/178:
The major thrust has been support for
Daniel Verkamp wrote:
Blair Campbell wrote:
Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
Excellent work! However, in testing the base CD in Virtual PC 2004, I
came across this problem during postinst.bat:
Batchfile 'C:\FDOS\POSTINST.BAT' does not
Thanks very very much to all :) :) :)
BTW, did not disapear and I intend to help a little more, soon ;-)
Alain
Blair Campbell escreveu:
Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
-
Using
Blair Campbell wrote:
Here I am, I've spent about 5 hours slowly downloading the full version,
getting just a few K per second, and right before it gets done, you go and
replace it.
I'm sorry, but I made it quite clear in the announcemet that the full
ISOs were NOT ready yet. I
- Original Message -
From: Blair Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.emulators.freedos.devel
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: Surprise!
Does the ISO I just re-uploaded work now? (I know, it's kinda cheating).
Hey jackass, did it occur to you that
Roberto Mariottini wrote:
Daniel Verkamp wrote:
Blair Campbell wrote:
Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
Excellent work! However, in testing the base CD in Virtual PC 2004, I
came across this problem during postinst.bat:
Roberto Mariottini wrote:
Daniel Verkamp wrote:
Blair Campbell wrote:
Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
Excellent work! However, in testing the base CD in Virtual PC 2004, I
came across this problem during postinst.bat:
Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
--
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
David Letterman (1947 - )
See ya
-
Using
: Blair Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 3, 2006 09:27 AM
To: 'FreeDOS Devel', 'FreeDOS User'
Subject: [Freedos-devel] Surprise!
Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
--
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
Blair Campbell wrote:
Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
Excellent work! However, in testing the base CD in Virtual PC 2004, I
came across this problem during postinst.bat:
Batchfile 'C:\FDOS\POSTINST.BAT' does not contain label 's4_801586'.
I
Blair Campbell wrote:
Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
w00t1
This is a very important day. I want to send out my thanks to everyone
who has worked on the FreeDOS Project, to help bring us to the 1.0
release. That includes both current members
How did you run the installer?
On 9/3/06, Daniel Verkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blair Campbell wrote:
Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
Excellent work! However, in testing the base CD in Virtual PC 2004, I
came across this problem during
Blair Campbell wrote:
How did you run the installer?
I booted from the CD, created a single 2GB primary partition using
xfdisk, rebooted, formatted C:, and followed the defaults on the package
selection screen. At this point, postinst.bat executed and produced
this error. I tried the
FYI: I have updated the FreeDOS web site with the 1.0 announcement. A
few pages have changed:
- the front page has been rearranged, and should now be friendlier to
new users. Let me know if the navigation is confusing; I tried to make
it so new users would know where to go, but still useful
Hi Jim, looks good! Just one thing on the left column: isn't report
bugs more of users than developers?
Aitor
2006/9/3, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FYI: I have updated the FreeDOS web site with the 1.0 announcement. A
few pages have changed:
- the front page has been rearranged, and should
Strange that I cannot reproduce this (even on an i586, with real hardware).
On 9/3/06, Daniel Verkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blair Campbell wrote:
How did you run the installer?
I booted from the CD, created a single 2GB primary partition using
xfdisk, rebooted, formatted C:, and
Does the ISO I just re-uploaded work now? (I know, it's kinda cheating).
On 9/3/06, Blair Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange that I cannot reproduce this (even on an i586, with real hardware).
On 9/3/06, Daniel Verkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blair Campbell wrote:
How did you run
Blair Campbell wrote:
Does the ISO I just re-uploaded work now? (I know, it's kinda cheating).
No, it behaves the same way as the original.
BTW, Virtual PC is available for free now if you would like to test it
yourself - http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtualpc/downloads/sp1.mspx
Please, be CAREFUL about this.
If you changed something critical, it may be a nightmare later when
users complain.
I don't think that marking as FreeDOS 1.0 a newly upgraded (untested)
CD is the best way to proceed, but now that you have done it, then the
only thing to do is: collect bugfixes and
Jim Hall wrote:
Blair Campbell wrote:
Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
w00t1
This is a very important day. I want to send out my thanks to everyone
who has worked on the FreeDOS Project, to help bring us to the 1.0
release. That
Here I am, I've spent about 5 hours slowly downloading the full version,
getting just a few K per second, and right before it gets done, you go and
replace it.
I'm sorry, but I made it quite clear in the announcemet that the full
ISOs were NOT ready yet. I would have annouced it if they
Hey jackass, ... (you all know the rest)
For future reference, I would greatly prefer that any obscenity or
otherwise rude 'behavior' be directed solely at my private e-mail
address, in order to prevent third parties from experiencing
discomfort resulting from subscription to these mailing
26 matches
Mail list logo
