On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:14:45PM +, Bret Johnson wrote:
> > Specifically, I am trying to determine if there are legacy
> > applications or operating systems that invoke standard BIOS
> > real-mode interrupt handlers while in 16bit protected mode. (The
> > legacy real-mode entry points - like
Hi,
N.B. I'm far from an expert, please no one scream at me for
misunderstanding what he means (or if it's more low-level than I
assume).
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>
> I've been working on an open-source BIOS project called SeaBIOS for
> the last few years: http://
edmět: Re: [Freedos-devel] BIOS calls in 16bit protected mode
> Datum: 14.6.2012 16:16:29
>
> > Specifically, I am trying to determine if there are legacy
> > applications or operating systems that invoke standard BIOS
> > real-mode
> Specifically, I am trying to determine if there are legacy
> applications or operating systems that invoke standard BIOS
> real-mode interrupt handlers while in 16bit protected mode. (The
> legacy real-mode entry points - like "int 0x13" - not the
> declared 16bit protected mode entry points def
Hi Jims,
> whitepaper from AMI on the BIOS-to-UEFI transition (very informative).
> http://www.ami.com/support/downloadwp.cfm?DLFile=AMI_UEFI_Transition_Whitepaper_PUB.pdf&FileID=1387
> UEFI is taking over and slowly(?)/fastly(?) transitioning out BIOS
> functionality.
> This could either mean a
Op 22-7-2011 6:48, Jim Michaels schreef:
> whitepaper from AMI on the BIOS-to-UEFI transition (very informative).
> http://www.ami.com/support/downloadwp.cfm?DLFile=AMI_UEFI_Transition_Whitepaper_PUB.pdf&FileID=1387
Thanks for that paper, might prove to be an interesting piece to read.
> how long
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:00:06 +0200, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
does not imply the manufacturers or even the creators of the generic
BIOS know the BIOS code very good. BIOS code developed in same way as
Windows:
...and DOS
keep compatibility and attach some really ugly extensions and
work-arounds.
Ind
Luchezar Georgiev schreef:
As far as I see, LinuxBIOS *replaces* the built-in BIOS, whereas I'm
talking about fitting an [D]OS kernel into the free space of *existing*
BIOS. No one should know better their board than the manufacturer itself
who has bought the generic BIOS from Award (Phoenix),
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:43:26 +0200, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
Luchezar Georgiev schreef:
I think that each OS has its own niche. Neiether Linux nor DOS can oust
each other. But try to fit a Linux in the BIOS flash ROM chip when you
have only several tens of kilobytes free there!
www.linuxbios.org
As
