>> > and leaves both (!!!) files present in the directory and empty ...
>> Which both do you mean? It deletes the original,
>> so only the temp file still exists?
>
> YES, but the following rename call apparently recreates the original
> name,
Yes.
> but without deleting the temp name,
No, the
2009/6/18 dos386
>
> I possibly know what the problem is (re-confirmed with FD 2038 and EDR
> 2009-03-28) :
>
> 2. UIP seems to do a very strange thing: it brews a temp file (AH=$5A,
> regrettably not
> visible above, but there was ONE call to it per attempt), throws away
> the handle (!!!), and r
91 Bytes instead of IUP: "IUP-BUG" is no longer owned by IUP:
http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=10301 :-)
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified lice
> > and leaves both (!!!) files present in the directory and empty ...
> Which both do you mean? It deletes the original,
> so only the temp file still exists?
YES, but the following rename call apparently recreates the original name,
but without deleting the temp name, and both are now empty :-(
>> 1. For AH=$5A, EDR-DOS appends slash, FreeDOS doesn't ... what is more
>> valid ???
>
> Appending is valid. RBIL is wrong. MS-DOS 5+ appends it, not only version
> 5.
And just in case someone suspects "evil" usage of DEBUG to disassemble
MS-DOS: that wasn't even required here. Just test the
> 1. For AH=$5A, EDR-DOS appends slash, FreeDOS doesn't ... what is more
> valid ???
Appending is valid. RBIL is wrong. MS-DOS 5+ appends it, not only version
5.
> 2. UIP seems to do a very strange thing: it brews a temp file (AH=$5A,
> regrettably not
> visible above, but there was ONE call
dos386 schreef:
> Hi
>
>
>> If you set VERSION to something different than 5.xx
>>
>
> so "5" is the default ?
I'd assume most people use the FAT32 supporting binary for maximum
compatibility. Still there's multiple choices then as the FreeDOS kernel
can be compiled for i8086 or fully-opt
Hi
> If you set VERSION to something different than 5.xx
so "5" is the default ?
> in config sys then FreeDOS will behave in the more common DOS 3/4/6/7 style
Is this documented somewhere ??? Still, FreeDOS IMHO should default
harder to FDCONFIG, FREECOM etc. ;-)
> Please explain.
What didn't
Hi dos386!
> I possibly know what the problem is (re-confirmed with FD 2038 and EDR
> 2009-03-28) :
... thanks for debugging IUP :-)
> UI21DEB 2009-05-02 CFG: sel=<> hcb=$0400 ver=$3205 dcm=$02FB fif=$
... sorry I do not understand the long trace ...
> 1. For AH=$5A, EDR-DOS appends slash
I possibly know what the problem is (re-confirmed with FD 2038 and EDR
2009-03-28) :
**
UI21DEB 2009-05-02 CFG: sel=<> hcb=$0400 ver=$3205 dcm=$02FB fif=$
APP: ree=0 psp=$0528 nam= N/A
* AX=$4800 | C=0 AX=$16A4
* AX=$7147 [
I wrote:
> Oops, the "IUP-BUG" needs retest.
DONE !!!
Tom wrote ( http://www.drdosprojects.de/forum/drp_forum/posts/6667.html ) :
> IUP bug reproduced here. will try to fix this
Lack of time or forgotten ... :-(
> If reproducable, I'll try to fix those, too (if time allows)
At least 2 are fi
> - int 2f.4a00 callback for DJ mechanism GUI now supported
WOW ... it's new ;-) but I have a safer method anyway.
> see what else needs attention?
- The CTMOUSE tracker, see above
- http://sf.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2475007&group_id=5109&atid=105109
2475007 "Debug generates unoptimized co
Hi Pat,
> Looks like a good list. Are these all there are? If not, would you
> like to go through our open list and see what else needs attention?
> I'll follow through with the mundane maintenance tasks of
> updating/closing bugs.
https://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=68906
Looks like a good list. Are these all there are? If not, would you
like to go through our open list and see what else needs attention?
I'll follow through with the mundane maintenance tasks of
updating/closing bugs.
Thanks.
Pat
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:38 AM, dos386 wrote:
> It took very lon
14 matches
Mail list logo
