Re: [Freedos-devel] re: Version 1.0

2004-03-11 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Alain escribió: Hi Aitor, PS: Sorry if I was a little bit though, I am still a bit shocked. New list promised this week (except maybe polishing the post-1.0 list, but will do my best too) I could be somewhat at fault here. I started a thead about version 1.0 unreguarding your comming li

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: Version 1.0

2004-03-11 Thread Alain
Hi Aitor, PS: Sorry if I was a little bit though, I am still a bit shocked. New list promised this week (except maybe polishing the post-1.0 list, but will do my best too) I could be somewhat at fault here. I started a thead about version 1.0 unreguarding your comming list. the fact is that IMHO

RE: [Freedos-devel] re: Version 1.0

2004-03-11 Thread aitor . sm
>Hi Alain, >> Only one program is missing and that is a Scan-Disk (written as 2 >words) >> utility for Fat32. For what I kow, DOSFSCK is working and need >only a >> small fixes in the read sector. >I strongly disagree. Our SCANDISK for FAT1x is completely defunct, >so we >have no SCAND

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: Version 1.0

2004-03-10 Thread Alain
Hi Eric, Only one program is missing and that is a Scan-Disk (written as 2 words) utility for Fat32. For what I kow, DOSFSCK is working and need only a small fixes in the read sector. I strongly disagree. :( see beloww Our SCANDISK for FAT1x is completely defunct, so we have no SCANDISK in the