Hi Tom,
> Ok - I'm pretty advanced with batch programming ;)
here's a testcase for you. It should print hello. Freecom tries to cd to
\hello.
Bart
@echo off
if \%1 == \finish goto finish
md cd
echo echo hello > cd\hello.bat
echo cdtest finish >> cd\hello.bat
cd\hello
:finish
del cd\hello.bat
rd
Gentelmen: I don't know the subject is but my 9-year old cousin is superb
at finding REAL and sometimes SERIOUS code errors by typo.
Should I ask what her rates are?
- Original Message -
From: tom ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bernd Blaauw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Freedos-
Hello Bernd,
> that testingsuite seems great, but batchfiles look a bit complex
> (recursive..).
Ok - I'm pretty advanced with batch programming ;)
> I tend to find some errors in FreeCOM by accident, when experimenting a
> bit with batch code and getting unexpected results.
then it would be gre
Kenneth J. Davis schreef:
On a completely unrelated topic, who do I send updated html help
documents to now?
Jeremy
:-)
ehm..you have your own webserver..upload it there and post a download link.
Anyway, you can send it to me and I'll make sure it makes it into the
HTMLHELP documentation and FreeD
tom ehlert wrote:
...
so I want to propose a new project (and any serious project should
...
this is a collection of almost trivial batches with a known/expected
outcome.
...
but the people working on the kernel/command.com would have some means
to verify, that a new version doesn't break old funct
Hello Erwin,
> Last fix in FreeCOM CVS (changed revision 1.155):
> "fix: LH: Errorlevel of program effects LH's error reporting"
great - this fixes an (so far unknown) bug, but
introduced a new problem.
> The trick to force-loadlow
> a program that tries to load itself into UMB by
> "LH /L: somep
