Re: [Freedos-devel] group-devel.htm file broken by dj_ renaming

2022-09-02 Thread Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel
Yes, indeed... (the cache issue again), sorry.

using Firefox 104.0.1 under NixOS___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel


Re: [Freedos-devel] group-devel.htm file broken by dj_ renaming

2022-09-02 Thread Jerome Shidel
Hi…

> On Sep 2, 2022, at 5:37 PM, Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel 
>  wrote:
> 
> On:
> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/repositories/unstable/pkg-html/group-devel.html
> the DJGPP packages seems to not work anymore due to the package renaming.
> 

That’s the browser caching issue again. 

 I thought you said you are using Linux. But, what browser are you using?



> ___
> Freedos-devel mailing list
> Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel


[Freedos-devel] group-devel.htm file broken by dj_ renaming

2022-09-02 Thread Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel
On:

http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/repositories/unstable/pkg-html/group-devel.html

the DJGPP packages seems to not work anymore due to the package renaming.___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel


Re: [Freedos-devel] An allegro game library version 4.2.2 package

2022-09-02 Thread Jerome Shidel
Hi, 

> On Sep 1, 2022, at 7:44 PM, Jim Hall  wrote:
> 
> Those 8.3 DOS filenames can be limiting for package names, so I like
> the idea of moving the DJGPP packages to DJ_x instead of DJGPP_xx.
> I saw your note on GitLab about this, too.
> 
> If you're also rebuilding the DJGPP packages (newer version?) you
> might rename the packages to something like this:
> 
> djgpp_bn (DJGPP binutils) ==> dj_bin
> djgpp_bs (DJGPP Bison) ==> dj_bison
> djgpp_db (DJGPP gdb) ==> dj_gdb
> djgpp_fq (DJGPP faq) ==> dj_faq
> djgpp_fx (DJGPP Flex) ==> dj_flex
> djgpp_gc (DJGPP gcc) ==> dj_gcc
> djgpp_gp (DJGPP gpp) ==> dj_gpp
> djgpp_mk (DJGPP make) ==> dj_make
> djgpp_ob (DJGPP Objective-C compiler) ==> dj_objc
> djgpp_rh (DJGPP rhide) ==> dj_rhide
> djgpp_tx (DJGPP Texinfo) ==> dj_txinf
> djgpp (DJGPP environment) ==> djgpp [keep the same]
> 
> Those names make more sense to me.
> 
> Jerome just released the T2209 test build, but maybe this could be
> added to the T2210 test build?

I’ll go ahead and implementing the new DJGPP package naming scheme. 
While not difficult, there are several steps involved with renaming packages 
and it will take a few minutes. 

:-)

Jerome



___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel