Re: [Freedos-devel] {Spam?} Re: New FreeDOS 1.1 test ISO (#3) released

2011-08-03 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 3-8-2011 23:41, Bernd Blaauw schreef: As for your drivers, I'm rather curious. Suppose I boot an USB flash disk (2.0 interface, 2.0 port), and crappy BIOS is happy to stick to 1.1 speed. The flash disk gets assigned C:. Next, I'd load your drivers, which 1) disable all BIOS legacy USB

Re: [Freedos-devel] {Spam?} Re: New FreeDOS 1.1 test ISO (#3)released

2011-08-03 Thread cm
Just wanted to add to the above by saying it would be awesome if a semi-full USB stack would exist. Basicly: recognise USB equipment whenever not booting from it. The problem generally preventing drivers from doing that is that, first, taking over the controllers disables any BIOS

Re: [Freedos-devel] {Spam?} Re: New FreeDOS 1.1 test ISO (#3)released

2011-08-03 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 4-8-2011 1:00, c...@bttr-software.de schreef: So a program could be written which would determine what drive DOS was booted from, and which would then make that drive disappear (or move it elsewhere). Afterwards, it could move all following drives down to fill the gap. For example, if it

Re: [Freedos-devel] {Spam?} Re: New FreeDOS 1.1 test ISO(#3)released

2011-08-03 Thread cm
http://www.bttr-software.de/products/drvexch/ I guess, written by you or one of the other BTTR regulars? :) I think it has a safeguard against C: though due to often-valid assumption that people actually boot from C: Perhaps Robert Riebisch knows more about the program as he hosts it.

Re: [Freedos-devel] {Spam?} Re: New FreeDOS 1.1 test ISO (#3) released

2011-07-28 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 28-7-2011 21:20, Bernd Blaauw schreef: Op 28-7-2011 4:30, Jim Michaels schreef: and cdrtools for dos? Hm time to remind those Mozilla Thunderbird developers about removing subject spam tag in responses and original if someone responds + sends. I've got no intention of clicking every message