On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:07:55 +0100 (BST), Bart Oldeman wrote:
Hmm. Sorry I didn't check out how dosfsck is compiled but perhaps you
should compile with the GCC
-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
options.
-Wmissing-declarations
may also come in handy
-Wnested-externs
sometimes too but it depends on your
The TU-Varna server doesn't work now
Just began working so I put it at
http://linux.tu-varna.acad.bg/~lig/freedos/DOSFSCK.EXE (58 KB)
Happy testing! But please take into account that I don't maintain it!
Lucho
---
This SF.Net email is
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:07:34 +0300, you wrote:
Hi Lucho,
Sorry, but I'm too busy for that. The TU-Varna server doesn't work now, so
I can't even do (4). I can't even test how DOSFSCK writes/fixes bad
volumes as I don't currently have one handy ;-)
If you need web space please tell me, I can
Oops! VolumeSeek() should be loff_t(loff_t offset) instead of off_t
VolumeSeek(off_t offset)! But there must be yet another bug, because
when I changed it, the bug was still there, although the code generated
for VolumeSeek() became correct. Will try to catch the other bug
tomorrow.
Caught it!
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
Oops! VolumeSeek() should be loff_t(loff_t offset) instead of off_t
VolumeSeek(off_t offset)! But there must be yet another bug, because
when I changed it, the bug was still there, although the code generated
for VolumeSeek() became correct.
!
31--2004 22:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
LG Caught it! VolumeSeek() wasn't declared anywhere so its return type was
LG assimed int.
:( This is anohter reason, why I so hate C mode, when prototypes may be
omited. :( How much of other bugs
