Did you try out this kernel?
Not yet (my ToTest pipeline is crowded ...)
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
On 3 May 2011 03:03, dos386 dos...@gmail.com wrote:
Good catch and thanks for the fix! I committed your patch to svn
Heh ... excellent ... so my excessive HD trashing
http://www.mail-archive.com/freedos-kernel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg02431.html
1+1/2 years ago was NOT only waste of time ?
Does this mean that it has been fixed?
Alain
Em 03-05-2011 04:03, dos386 escreveu:
Good catch and thanks for the fix! I committed your patch to svn
Heh ... excellent ... so my excessive HD trashing
http://www.mail-archive.com/freedos-kernel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg02431.html
1+1/2 years
There is work going on, but noe estimate to completion.
I would tend to agree, use 2038 until it is fixed.
Pat
Project Coordinator
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:03 AM, dos386 dos...@gmail.com wrote:
I have prepeared a new FreeDOS distribution for REAL USE in the field
Is there anyone working
Hi
1. No new details to the Crosslink-BUG ... cluster size is 4 KiB :-|
Why do you refer to an obsolete mail ?
Half of it is not a bug, the other half is...
What ???
This is because DIR tells you how much space is used / free.
the which you mention, you force a recalculation...
I
Well, the tracker entry is 28 days old, this discussion is 12 days
old, and ... this is not the first time I have to whine about the
user base of FreeDOS, if such a thing exists at all. At least, this
time the BUG got opened by http://sourceforge.net/users/tnavratil/
Tnavratil, not me.
So new
Well, got __STRANGE__ news:
1. No new details to the Crosslink-BUG ... cluster size is 4 KiB :-|
2. Discovered a NEW BUG:
- present in both 2038 and 2039
- not critical
- possibly related to the Crosslink-BUG (probability not very high ...)
- reproductability as ALWAYS :-)
Steps to repropduce:
I'm having a look
Thanks :-)
how large is your FAT partition exactly?
Cca 6 GiB , have to check the other PC ...
There is always the GB/GiB confusion...
1 GiB = 2^30 Bytes
1 GB = ??? (don't know don't use)
what is the cluster size (I'm looking for potential overflows)
4 or 8 KiB , have
Hi,
I'm having a look. But I can't reproduce it so far. So:
* how large is your FAT partition exactly? There is always the GB/GiB
confusion...
* what is the cluster size (I'm looking for potential overflows)
* does it happen with plain FreeCOM COPY, XCOPY, or any copy?
Bart
