Hi!
12--2004 14:28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Luchezar Georgiev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
and removes (parts? of) tom's patch.
As you wrote youself, it's better to have the whole patch than parts of
it. And even better is to solve entirely the problem which this kludge
solves
Hi!
12--2004 13:54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Show this, please.
LG See it in the CVS, along with the nice additions of Eduardo.
CVS isn't accesible for me.
Let me ask reverse question: why you add this _another FreeDOS specific
function, which
Hello Luchezar,
and removes (parts? of) tom's patch.
As you wrote youself, it's better to have the whole patch than parts of
it. And even better is to solve entirely the problem which this kludge
solves partially. But we don't know the problem :-(
at least I know the problem - and
Hi!
12--2004 14:28 Arkady V.Belousov wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And what about INT2F/122F?
LG Although only MS-DOS 4.0 had it, I won't remove it
AVB Let me ask reverse question: why you add this _another FreeDOS
AVB specific
AVB function, which duplicates another specific function_,
