Ex-FAT support instead of FAT+ or FAT32+??
This idea seems more good like FAT+ instead :-)
And how is the support for Windows 3.1 / 3.11?
- Original Message -
From: freedos-kernel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
To: freedos-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 10:26
Hi Abrahan,
Ex-FAT support instead of FAT+ or FAT32+??
This idea seems more good like FAT+ instead :-)
And how is the support for Windows 3.1 / 3.11?
While it is called FAT, exFAT seems to differ a lot
from FAT. Also, exFAT is heavily patented... Talking
about FAT+... I really wonder
