Re: [Freedos-kernel] [Freedos-user] New kernel

2011-07-02 Thread dos386
In my tests 2039 turned out to be unusable so please use 2040 ;-)


-- 
~~~ wow ~~~

--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
___
Freedos-kernel mailing list
Freedos-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel


Re: [Freedos-kernel] [Freedos-user] New kernel

2011-06-29 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 30-6-2011 1:29, Santiago Almenara schreef:
 Thanks Eric!

 I'll try 2040 instead of 2030.


Just for everyone's information, I'm still able to hit a double BAD FAT 
INFO - Run CHKDSK error message from the kernel occasionally
The only situation in which I sometimes am able to trigger that, is by 
booting from USB flash drive (at 1.1 speeds, bah) and then deleting a 
8MB (or more) ISO file from root of that directory.
In addition to that the USB flashdrive and keyboard disappear, forcing a 
system reboot through the case's hardware button. Not narrowed down this 
situation, but wasn't using USB drivers.

However, for general use 2040 should be perfectly safe as floppy and 
harddisk controllers aren't such a mess as legacy bios emulation.



--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
___
Freedos-kernel mailing list
Freedos-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel