>> I'm happy that this thing - which is old and hard to maintain...
>
> But I was talking about hdpmi32...!?
Yes, me too. hdpmi32 v1.0 (10/1993) is older than FreeDOS v0.001
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
De
Hi Japheth,
> I'm happy that this thing - which is old and hard to maintain...
But I was talking about hdpmi32...!?
> It's cool ... and it runs with Himem only.
> I tried Jemm, MS Emm386, DR Emm386, Win98 DOS Box,
> CWSDPMI, HDPMI (with/without Jemm's NOVCPI option)
> ... nothing worked. Anywa
> Actually: Why does hdpmi use a non-1:1 mapping linear/physical?
> I mean it has every right to do so, but it turned out that this
> can make DPMI usage a bit more foolproof ;-). I assume it saves
> a bit of page table space? Being NOT foolproof can be good as
> it can help to detect bugs, but oto
Hi Japheth,
> > PS: The CTS Toasted 1996 ctstoast demo runs okay in LFB
> > mode if CWSDPMI is resident or if you use DOSEMU, but I
> > promise you that I did not write CTS Toasted and did not
> > ask the authors to give it the same bug as PCXTEXT ;-).
> I don't understand what you are talking a
Hi,
is anybody interested in old computer hardware.
Since I bought a new pc on yesterdays I would like to get rid of one of
my old ones with the following configuration:
> ATX Big Tower
>
> Gigabyte BX2000+ DualBios Motherboard
> Intel Pentium III 600 FSB 133
> Intel i440BX Chipset
> 256 MB SDR
