I am a little late in responding; moving an entire house of belongings
and children is not fun.
Mateusz provided a good explanation - it is active vs. passive mode
connections. Back 15 years ago before NAT was in widespread use all FTP
connections were active. The client would initiate a
Am 21.08.2014 um 22:47 schrieb Michael B. Brutman mbbrut...@brutman.com:
I am a little late in responding; moving an entire house of belongings
and children is not fun.
Wow, best wishes! We are looking for a new house at the moment, so this is
something that might happen to our family too,
Hi,
N.B. The OP's subject line is too vague. You'd probably get more help
with a more specific description of the problem. Some people don't
have time to pore over all the various threads.
Anyways, please keep reading below, I'll (weakly) respond inline.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Mateusz
Just use passive mode
connections
and you'll be fine.
It's exactly the other way around ;)
Ulrich has its server behind a masquerading PAT, not the client. So ACTIVE mode
is what should work, IF its ftp client is smart enough to ignore the IP
presented by the server in the control channel
There's 100 PCI drivers here
(http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/dos/pktdrv.zip).
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
N.B. The OP's subject line is too vague. You'd probably get more help
with a more specific description of the problem. Some people don't
