Re: [Freedos-user] Fdnet

Den 2022-03-08 kl. 12:55, skrev Jerome Shidel: On Mar 8, 2022, at 4:44 AM, Björn Morell wrote: I run MTCP and have for a while and it works great, ftp server etc. I have fresh installatio of 1.3 on an old fujitsi-siemens 1000 mhz, with an intel 815 chipset so the e1000pkt works fine

Re: [Freedos-user] Fdnet

> On Mar 8, 2022, at 4:44 AM, Björn Morell wrote: > > I run MTCP and have for a while and it works great, ftp server etc. I have > fresh installatio of 1.3 on an > > old fujitsi-siemens 1000 mhz, with an intel 815 chipset so the e1000pkt works > fine with DHCP and it > > updates the .cfg.

[Freedos-user] Fdnet

I run MTCP and have for a while and it works great, ftp server etc. I have fresh installatio of 1.3 on an old fujitsi-siemens 1000 mhz, with an intel 815 chipset so the e1000pkt works fine with DHCP and it updates the .cfg. I ran the wattcp.bat and have a wattcp.cfg in freedos\bin. Paths to

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNET missing from FreeDOS 1.3-RC4

On 10/14/2021 4:06 AM, Jon Brase wrote: Oct 13, 2021 23:39:17 Jim Hall It appears that somewhere along the line, someone (at AMD?) had access to the sources, probably in a larger source tree, and ran a batch job or script to apply the "AMD" statement to a bunch of source files. And that

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNET missing from FreeDOS 1.3-RC4

> Hi Jim and Everyone, > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:58 AM Jim Hall wrote: > [..] > > *If you agree or disagree, I'd appreciate your reply to this email. > Agreement can be simply "agree" or "+1". If you disagree, please > discuss. (But consensus from the last discussion favored including >

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNET missing from FreeDOS 1.3-RC4

Hi Jim and Everyone, > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:58 AM Jim Hall wrote: > [..] > *If you agree or disagree, I'd appreciate your reply to this email. > Agreement can be simply "agree" or "+1". If you disagree, please > discuss. (But consensus from the last discussion favored including > FDNET, so

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNET missing from FreeDOS 1.3-RC4

Oct 13, 2021 23:39:17 Jim Hall > > > It appears that somewhere along the line, someone (at AMD?) had access > to the sources, probably in a larger source tree, and ran a batch job > or script to apply the "AMD" statement to a bunch of source files. And > that happened to catch these GPL and

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNET missing from FreeDOS 1.3-RC4

> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:44 AM Brandon Taylor > wrote: > > > > I've just installed FreeDOS 1.3-RC4 on a virtual machine, and, > > upon running FDIMPLES, discovered that FDNET is nowhere to be > > found. What's the issue here? On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:58 AM Jim Hall wrote: > > I had asked

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNET missing from FreeDOS 1.3-RC4

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:44 AM Brandon Taylor wrote: > > I've just installed FreeDOS 1.3-RC4 on a virtual machine, and, > upon running FDIMPLES, discovered that FDNET is nowhere to be > found. What's the issue here? I had asked that we not include FDNET in FreeDOS 1.3 RC4 due to license

[Freedos-user] FDNET missing from FreeDOS 1.3-RC4

I've just installed FreeDOS 1.3-RC4 on a virtual machine, and, upon running FDIMPLES, discovered that FDNET is nowhere to be found. What's the issue here? Brandon Taylor ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNet package license problems

On 4/11/2021 5:54 PM, Bryan Kilgallin wrote: Michael: https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/pkg-html/fdnet.html FDNET is being distributed under

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNet package license problems

Michael: https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/pkg-html/fdnet.html FDNET is being distributed under GPL V2. {404 Page not found! Either this

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNet package license problems

We previously had notes in the wiki about questionable licenses in the FDNet package, and it was marked Yellow ("Maybe") in the wiki for FreeDOS 1.3. So I think it's a good idea to pull FDNet for now. I've updated the wiki to reflect that.

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNet package license problems

> On Apr 10, 2021, at 7:03 PM, Michael Brutman wrote: > >  > Jerome, > > In the grand scheme of things it is not a big deal and it has been wrong for > years. > > Thanks for taking care of it. If it does remain then Rugxulo should consider > updating the parts of mTCP (and anything else)

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNet package license problems

Jerome, In the grand scheme of things it is not a big deal and it has been wrong for years. Thanks for taking care of it. If it does remain then Rugxulo should consider updating the parts of mTCP (and anything else) that was repackaged for use in FDNet. Mike On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 3:52 PM

Re: [Freedos-user] FDNet package license problems

Hello Michael, > On Apr 10, 2021, at 3:20 PM, Michael Brutman wrote: > > Gents (Jerome and Rugxulo in particular) ... > > As per > https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/pkg-html/fdnet.html > >

[Freedos-user] FDNet package license problems

Gents (Jerome and Rugxulo in particular) ... As per https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/pkg-html/fdnet.html FDNET is being distributed under GPL V2. However, it includes mTCP source code which is licensed under GPL V3. As per