TechFan schreef:
I just tried this on a Compaq Evo D500 2.0GHz, no SATA, probably ATA66.
. .same symptoms.
most secure steps to make sure it's only the XCDROM driver and not
FreeDOS components, is to try a Win98 bootdisk and copy XCDROM to it.
After all MS-DOS has become the defacto
, January 30, 2006 6:07:10 PM
*Subject:* [Freedos-user] Re: XCDROM bug still there
TechFan schreef:
I just tried this on a Compaq Evo D500 2.0GHz, no SATA, probably ATA66.
. .same symptoms.
most secure steps to make sure it's only the XCDROM driver and not
FreeDOS components, is to try a Win98
Tested Win98 bootdisk. Same issues.
- Original Message -
*From:* Bernd Blaauw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
*Sent:* Monday, January 30, 2006 6:07:10 PM
*Subject:* [Freedos-user] Re: XCDROM bug still there
TechFan schreef:
I just tried this on a Compaq Evo
Someone just pointed out this new OpenSource driver to me. I am working
with the thinstation.sf.net project to make a boot disk that we can
distribute without having to worry about licensing. We have had a
freedos disk doing what we need it to for a while, but I ran into the
issue of getting a
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:52:21 +1000, you wrote:
Hi,
I just tried the XCDROM driver as a drop in replacement and it isn't
working. It adds a drive letter, but it won't read the contents at
all. It works fine with the old driver still. . .any tips? Thanks.
Can you give more information?
I've
Thanks for the response. I am using the latest. . .tried 1.9, then saw
2.0, so I tried that too.
I am not sure what details would be most helpful. Is there a way to get
a log/debug output. This is in a Dell Optiplex GXa 333 with a single
PATA drive and single CDROM (NEC rModel CDR-1900A). Was
