Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-12 Thread Frantisek Rysanek via Freedos-user
On 11 Jan 2024 at 22:06, Eric Auer via Freedos-user wrote: > > Hi Anton, > > > The machines are indeed physical with custom made ISA Bus controller > > cards, built on prototype board, and only 4 were made, 2 in production > > That sounds exciting! > > > plan is to eventually replace ...

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-11 Thread Eric Auer via Freedos-user
Hi Anton, The machines are indeed physical with custom made ISA Bus controller cards, built on prototype board, and only 4 were made, 2 in production That sounds exciting! plan is to eventually replace ... with something more ubiquitous. Looking at other forums, people do impressive

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-11 Thread Anton Gustafsson via Freedos-user
I apologize for the slow reply, I have been caught up to the neck with work! Wow, what an interesting read this thread has been, you guys certainly have lots of experience. Thanks Roderick for the link to DMH Software, I'll have a look at it, and thanks Frantisek, that was an interesting

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-10 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
I tend to be very pragmatic with my code. For example, instead of trying to port existing libraries (and dealing with all of their dependencies) I'll usually just write what I need from scratch and do the bare minimum. Where that is not possible (HTTPS on an 8088 class machine) I'd go with some

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-10 Thread Frantisek Rysanek via Freedos-user
On 8 Jan 2024 at 10:29, Michael Brutman via Freedos-user wrote: ... > > Obviously something that does real-time operations should not be > burdened with a TSR.  But it should also not be burdened with running > DOS on legacy hardware either.  Nobody in their right mind is running > something

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-08 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
That last post was impressive, but I think it makes things way too complicated. Obviously something that does real-time operations should not be burdened with a TSR. But it should also not be burdened with running DOS on legacy hardware either. Nobody in their right mind is running something

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-08 Thread Frantisek Rysanek via Freedos-user
On 7 Jan 2024 at 21:28, Anton Gustafsson via Freedos-user wrote: > > Hi Roderick! I agree, in this case it is mostly to satisfy my > supervisor's need to follow protocol. All machines in the network are > supposed monitored (load, mem, swap etc) using a software called Zabbix > which has the

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-07 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
How much is it worth ($$$) to your supervisor? SNMP runs over UDP. It is possible to write an SNMP agent that runs in the background as a TSR, but such a thing doesn't exist today. If somebody is willing to invest it can be done. -Mike On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 12:30 PM Anton Gustafsson via

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-07 Thread Roderick Klein via Freedos-user
On 7-01-24 21:28, Anton Gustafsson via Freedos-user wrote: Hi Roderick! I agree, in this case it is mostly to satisfy my supervisor's need to follow protocol. I can understand following but at a certain moment it feels like it becomes a bureaucracy, Do a quick search for SNMP DOS agent. I

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-07 Thread Anton Gustafsson via Freedos-user
Hi Roderick! I agree, in this case it is mostly to satisfy my supervisor's need to follow protocol. All machines in the network are supposed monitored (load, mem, swap etc) using a software called Zabbix which has the ability to use either their own agent, ICMP or SNMP. It is possible to use

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-06 Thread Roderick Klein via Freedos-user
On 6-01-24 18:24, Anton Gustafsson via Freedos-user wrote: Hi! We have a few network connected FreeDOS machines, running on an isolated network using MSClient. I have been instructed that all our machines on the network should be monitored, by either SNMP or a Zabbix agent, and not ICMP ping