[Freedos-user] Undeliverable Mail
Requested action not taken: virus detected Original message follows. Received: from manilal.com [217.164.51.98] by manilal.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.00) id A15F93E0092; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:48:39 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:14:02 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! The requested mail is attached! Yours sincerely +++ X-Attachment-Type: document +++ X-Attachment-Status: no virus found +++ Powered by the new F-Secure OnlineAntiVirus +++ Visit us: www.f-secure.com --=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=mail5.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mail5.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA qESeqUgA/8cbAP/HGwD/xxuD48kbDP/HG+jgzRsZ/8cbg/eaGwL/xxsA/8cb A//HGwD/xhtg/8cbYuDUGwn/xxvo4MwbBf/HG1JpY2gA/8cb UEUAAEwBAwDVwW5AAADgAA8BCwEGAABQEPACAM4/AwMA AFADQAAAEAIAAAQABAAAYAMAABACAAAQAAAQ ABAAABAQUAMAgAEA AABjb2RlAADwAgAAEAAA AAAEAACAAADgdGV4dAAAUAADAABCBAAA QAAA4HJzcmMAABBQAwAAAgAAAEYAAEAAAMAA [message truncated] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047alloc_id=10808op=click ___ Freedos-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] TriDOS
Florian Xaver wrote: Hi! Has anyone tried it? http://phantom.urbis.net.il/bphantom/tridos.html Maybe it should be included into the FreeDOS Util set. What do you think, would it be difficult to enhance it to support DPMI programs? Bye, Flo I'm going through some old email, and found Florian's note from 6/5. In short, Triple-DOS is a pre-emptive multitasker for DOS on session level a-la Windows in Enhanced mode or OS/2. Looks interesting - but since I haven't tried it out yet, I won't add it to the Util list. I will, however, mirror it on ibiblio. Triple-DOS has nearly no device drivers. Triple-DOS doesn't provide a proprietary API for DOS programs - its purpose is to run existent DOS binaries that are not aware of multitasking. This release, version 0.50, is freeware using a BSD-similar license. DOS may be any type or version but it must be compatible with MS-DOS version 3.0 - so FreeDOS may work, but I haven't tried it. According to the web site, you may start a new DOS session at any time by pressing Alt-Enter, change to the next session with Alt-Tab, and terminate the currently active session with Alt-End. You may quit Triple-DOS any time by pressing Alt-Esc. In order to compile Triple-DOS you need MASM 6.x. ZIP file includes an RCS directory that contains all previous versions. Use GNU RCS to manage the revisions. Triple-DOS has a DPMI 0.9 server. Simple assembly programs work (both 16-bit and 32-bit) but support for large applications in multitasking environment is tricky. Since the DPMI server was never stable, the DPMI entry points were always disabled in release versions. -- _ This email message has been automatically encrypted using ROT-26. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047alloc_id=10808op=click ___ Freedos-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] Kernel LFN support
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 11:35:42 +0300, you wrote: Hi Lucho, Why not put up a list of FreeDOS-incompatible software so that problems can be solved one-by-one? Can you ask your friend to make a list of his software not running under FreeDOS and a brief description of the problem with each piece of software? I've always thought that the biggest problem of the FreeDOS kernel aren't bugs but incompatibility (which is also a kind of bug ;-) Because he's testing with some very old games which may have protection. That kind of games is not worth spending time on it, but if you're hacker, then it's good for you ;-) I ask him to provide some 'not working' application for me to test, maybe a bit later. NTFS it a too complex filesystem for DOS. The FAT32 + LFN combination is Just thinking maybe can use FreeDOS to rescue NTFS, if too complex then drop it. enough. DOSLFN is a giant patch over the kernel and as its authors seem to ignore FreeDOS, its incompatibility will increase - so the only good solution to the LFN problem is integrating LFN support into the kernel, indeed. But integrating LFN into kernel will lack flexibility ... How about modify the kernel to provide API, and load LFN as a device driver? Then we can change the device driver without altering the kernel version by version. Unfortunately not all BIOSes can boot off an USB memory stick. Again, why not put up a list of the motherboards proved to boot and proved to be unable to boot FreeDOS off a memory stick? I don't have a USB memory stick, I think it's worth to buy one for use and test. Also your idea was good, but I need help from others because I have a few motherboard only, the list is meaningless if only 3 or 4 boards there. Rgds, Johnson. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047alloc_id=10808op=click ___ Freedos-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] Re: Kernel LFN support
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:50:13 +0200 (MEST), you wrote: Hi Eric, Hi, before we re-invent the wheel again, we should first try to get DOSLFN working with FreeDOS again. Jason writes that DOSLFN uses the Is FreeDOS ready for LFN? I mean LFN will affect the FAT table, is FreeDOS already spare enough 'space' for the extra space? And other disk maintenance program will not cause false alarm. (e.g. corrupted FAT table, misallocation of file) Rgds, Johnson. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047alloc_id=10808op=click ___ Freedos-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
