Re: [Freedos-user] FreeCOM 0.84-Pre

2005-08-13 Thread Kenneth J. Davis
Johnson Lam wrote: On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:08:26 -0400, you wrote: ... I've tested the CMDXMS.HEAD for a period of time, it's very stable thanks for testing I updated the descriptions a little, so hopefully it is clearer which are the recommended versions for more general testing/use.

[Freedos-user] FreeCOM 0.84-Pre

2005-08-13 Thread Johnson Lam
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:08:26 -0400, you wrote: Hi Kenneth, >FreeCom only has one branch that I touch (HEAD is just cvs terminology >for the primary branch); though other branches do exist (state unknown >and/or already merged into HEAD). I've tested the CMDXMS.HEAD for a period of time, it's v

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS FDISK issue with Windows Build

2005-08-13 Thread Gerry Hickman
*kernel 2034, 2035, 2035A and the CVS kernel I see 2.0.35a on SourceForge, so that must be the Kernel I need. Sorry, I've just realized I'm already running kernel 2.0.35a :) -- Gerry Hickman (London UK) --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS FDISK issue with Windows Build

2005-08-13 Thread Gerry Hickman
Hi, Thanks for the help finding the files! Here's the original text from Bernd, note where he says 'unofficial'/'development', and gives 'fdos' as the site: just get the 'unofficial'/'development' versions of components. *SYS 3.6 from www.fdos.org/kernel (sys.dev.com) *kernel 2034, 2035, 203

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS FDISK issue with Windows Build

2005-08-13 Thread Kenneth J. Davis
Gerry Hickman wrote: Hi Kenneth, can't work out how these numbers relate to the directory listing on the fdos.org/kernel website. 4 different versions, 2034, 2035, and 2035a are on sourceforge file release page, cvs kernels are the ones (either stable, eg 2035a-cvs or devel 2035w-cvs) on