Hi!
18-Янв-2007 11:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Japheth) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
Better than watcom? How much better and in which areas?
J In Open Watcom just the 32bit C(++) compiler and WD are pretty good. The rest
J is of mixed quality.
J With optimisation on MSVC CL.EXE
May you show examples? Starting from minimal void main(){}, then with
printf(Hello, world!\n), then something more complex? With OW 1.6:
a dummy main and a hello world main are utterly irrelevant if you want to
compare size/speed optimisations (leaving CRT aside).
A complex sample is
Hello Japheth,
May you show examples? Starting from minimal void main(){}, then with
printf(Hello, world!\n), then something more complex? With OW 1.6:
a dummy main and a hello world main are utterly irrelevant if you want to
compare size/speed optimisations (leaving CRT aside).
right
Hi Arkady,
[PS: I am still looking for people who can help with
reviewing my 2035c versus 2036 diff report, thanks!]
type test1.c
void main () {}
wcl test1.c
wcc TEST1.C
wlink @__wcl__.lnk
type test2.c
#include stdio.h
void main () { printf (Hello, world!\n); }
...
TEST1EXE
Hi!
19-Янв-2007 15:09 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Japheth) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
May you show examples? Starting from minimal void main(){}, then with
printf(Hello, world!\n), then something more complex? With OW 1.6:
J a dummy main and a hello world main are utterly
How much?
MS VC is 6% better than OW, both optimizing for size. OW is not bad,
especially if comparing MSVC with TC, where MSVC is 25% better.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join
