Maybe it is context sensitive in TASM, 0 in .data and nop in .code?
I believe NASM has a whole range of ways to align things, including
pad with user-specified value and pick a multi byte noop machine
code instruction where appropriate but you would have to check the
docs which is selected
It's possible under freedos 1.0 put the drivers in XMS insted UMB?
Can be used cloaking.exe , and in wich modality?
many thanks in advance.
Roberto iw2evk
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/put-drivers-in-XMS-tp17621306p17621306.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - User mailing
iw2evk wrote:
It's possible under freedos 1.0 put the drivers in XMS insted UMB?
Can be used cloaking.exe , and in wich modality?
FloX has a short note about cloaking on FreeDOS at
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.DPMS.
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
Hi Robert,
I remember some old driver in protected mode and cloaking
related stuff from the old days but only few drivers did
support it afair? So I would suggest that we just take our
new open source drivers and turn those which really need
a lot of RAM into JLM modules for JEMM386. The
iw2evk schrieb:
It's possible under freedos 1.0 put the drivers in XMS insted UMB?
Can be used cloaking.exe , and in wich modality?
many thanks in advance.
Roberto iw2evk
Hey!
I had some time ago a similar suggestion. Loading into EMS/XMS would be
a bad idea because more outdated
It's fixed in v1.8.
Odd, my report already was about 1.80 ...
Ok, then you forgot to tell us that you have access to a time machine. Because
the versions stored on my site are v1.7 and v1.8pre.
Then an error message would have been better than a 0 value...
Sure. Looking back, many things
Eric Auer escreveu:
[...] and that you can use Jack's UIDE driver with UDMA
and SATA harddisk and cdrom support and [...]
Does this mean anything about fast SATA drivers?
Alain
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
I found out how to get what I want from NTI DVD-Maker Gold, which was good
enough to provide me with some clues about how it was processing my data
compilation.
My initial settings included File: Data Layout Properties:
File System: ISO 9660 Level 1 (8 + 3 restricted character set)
Data
2008/06/03 08:42 +0200, Japheth
Indeed. I couldn't imagine anyone using bitfields seriously, because there are
some stupid design flaws.
I did, using only the offsets.
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
