Re: [Freedos-user] Bug? Confusing boot options in FreeDOS 1.2

> Am 08.02.2017 um 22:46 schrieb Jerome Shidel >: > > Bug? Not really. > Is it correct? Not even close. Then lets correct it. :-) It’s pretty easy, as I showed in my last mail. > Also, #2 should not say EMM386 when it uses JEMM386. That’s even

Re: [Freedos-user] Rolling up from 1.1?

Also, if you run the installer in advanced mode. You can choose not to replace your config files, use zip to backup and other stuff. But, generally I recommend just running the install in normal mode. If you quit the installer and run it as "setup adv" , it will run in advanced mode. You can

Re: [Freedos-user] Rolling up from 1.1?

> On Feb 8, 2017, at 4:57 PM, David McMackins wrote: > > Call me a noob, but is there a preferred way to upgrade from FreeDOS 1.1 > to 1.2 while keeping configurations intact? I haven't personally loaded > the new installer yet, but I wanted to check before I tried,

[Freedos-user] Rolling up from 1.1?

Call me a noob, but is there a preferred way to upgrade from FreeDOS 1.1 to 1.2 while keeping configurations intact? I haven't personally loaded the new installer yet, but I wanted to check before I tried, since my FreeDOS installation is on real hardware. Happy Hacking, David E. McMackins II

Re: [Freedos-user] Bug? Confusing boot options in FreeDOS 1.2

Bug? Not really. Is it correct? Not even close. You are correct that there are at least a couple issues with the FDCONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT file. Also, #2 should not say EMM386 when it uses JEMM386. The current 1.2 config files are based on a clean install of 1.1 into VMware Fusion. Then

[Freedos-user] Bug? Confusing boot options in FreeDOS 1.2

In FreeDOS 1.1 there was a boot option 4 „Load FreeDOS without drivers“. [see picture 1] It booted a clean system, with SYSTEM and COMMAND and nothing else. [2] In FreeDOS 1.2 there is a boot option 3 „Load FreeDOS without drivers (Emergency Mode) [3] If you choose it, you load FreeDOS with