Re: [Freedos-user] the msdos 4.0 sources has some multitasking code

2024-05-14 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
That attitude toward the MS-DOS source code seems rather limiting and short-sighted. My recent device driver worked well enough on later versions of DOS (and FreeDOS) but I was having a devil of a time trying to figure out why DOS 2.x would not honor the device driver telling it that the media

Re: [Freedos-user] Dial-up emulation?

2024-04-23 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
You clearly don't use search engines too much ... Try "FreeDOS" and "Networking" as your two words for the search. On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:38 PM Brandon Taylor via Freedos-user < freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Since FreeDOS doesn't support physical network hardware (even if

Re: [Freedos-user] "Upgrade" from MS-DOS 6.2.2 (fwd)

2024-02-26 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
I'm just kind of amazed at what I read here at times. It is no secret that DOS is no longer a mainstream operating system. As a result, support for it on physical hardware is minimal, if it is supported at all. Modern machines are just not intended to be used with DOS as the primary, "bare

Re: [Freedos-user] shutdown and USB Stick ?

2024-01-29 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
FAT is finicky but FAT is not the issue here. As long as the machine has sufficient time to complete its last writes and you don't have any programs running using the disk, it should always be safe to shut down - DOS doesn't buffer or delay writes unless you have some sort of disk caching program

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-10 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
sort of proxy that meets the spirit of the requirement. Anyway, I think the OP has been scared off so this is an academic discussion now. ;-0 On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 3:02 AM Frantisek Rysanek wrote: > On 8 Jan 2024 at 10:29, Michael Brutman via Freedos-user wrote: > ... > > &

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-08 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
That last post was impressive, but I think it makes things way too complicated. Obviously something that does real-time operations should not be burdened with a TSR. But it should also not be burdened with running DOS on legacy hardware either. Nobody in their right mind is running something

Re: [Freedos-user] SNMP agent for DOS?

2024-01-07 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
How much is it worth ($$$) to your supervisor? SNMP runs over UDP. It is possible to write an SNMP agent that runs in the background as a TSR, but such a thing doesn't exist today. If somebody is willing to invest it can be done. -Mike On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 12:30 PM Anton Gustafsson via

Re: [Freedos-user] roundcube, is freedos, or dos based mail clients?

2023-11-24 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
It's difficult to follow all of the details of the discussion. Have you ever looked at getting a shell account on sdf.org? It still supports plain old Telnet I think it comes with an email address. They support POP3 and IMAP access to the email too. Links and Lynx are available there when

Re: [Freedos-user] Unicode and codepages in apps already bundled with FreeDOS?

2023-06-23 Thread Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
I added some limited Unicode support to mTCP Telnet and mTCP IRCjr in the last release a few months ago. - I used a text file to store the mapping. That lets people add code points or make corrections if they don't like the choices I made. - The code uses the text file both ways; to