Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-02-13 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
(Un)fortunately, FAT is so inherent to DOS in a way that no block devices can host other fs (all the rest are "network file systems"), that I doubt that these ideas, yet if marvelous, are hardly possible. Aitor Christian Voß escribió: Hi, I can't understand the crying about the FAT patent.

Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-01-19 Thread Carl Spitzer
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 20:22 -0500, ultramancool wrote: > And of course the most important part: to scare the open source > community into thinking they can't use FAT anymore. ;-) Doesnt FAt come from cpm and therefore prior art? Remember American judges are often dumber than a box of rocks. CWS

Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-01-12 Thread Derek Newhall
--- Christian Voß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I can't understand the crying about the FAT patent. > In the whole "world" of > file systems are enough candidates to replace the > Grandma of file systems. > And most of them are free. I.e. HFS and HFS+ (the > file systems of MacOS) are > GP

Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-01-12 Thread ultramancool
Andre Tertling wrote: If I read the patents in question right, they are not exactly "FAT" patents but rather "LFN for FAT" patents. The primary reason for the patents is to cut a nice slice from the memory stick/card market for M$. FAT has one large benefit: Because it is so simple, it is easy

Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-01-12 Thread Andre Tertling
If I read the patents in question right, they are not exactly "FAT" patents but rather "LFN for FAT" patents. The primary reason for the patents is to cut a nice slice from the memory stick/card market for M$. FAT has one large benefit: Because it is so simple, it is easy to implement on low-e

Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-01-12 Thread BIAF
I Agree, things like this will only make the FreeDOS crew rebell with new FS, MS are doing them selfs no favours at all with this move. But its been on the brew for along time, maybe they will not do much about it now. >Hi, >I can't understand the crying about the FAT patent. In the whole "world

[Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-01-12 Thread Christian Voß
Hi,   I can't understand the crying about the FAT patent. In the whole "world" of file systems are enough candidates to replace the Grandma of file systems. And most of them are free. I.e. HFS and HFS+ (the file systems of MacOS) are GPL and is supported by the linux distros for free. Ok, on Window