I just installed FreeDOS on a newly created fat32 partition on my sata hd. The
other partitions are in ntfs and running Windows XP. Since FreeDOS doesnt see
XP it didnt edit my boot.ini. I have been trying to code it myself with such
things as:
C:\FDOSBOOT.BIN=FreeDOS
D:\FDOSBOOT.BIN=FreeDOS
Wayne,
I just installed FreeDOS on a newly created FAT32 partition on my SATA
HD. The other partitions are in NTFS and running Windows/XP. Since
FreeDOS doesn't see XP it didn't edit my boot.ini. I have been trying
to code it myself with such things as:
C:\FDOSBOOT.BIN=FreeDOS
Generally it really should work with
C:\FDOSBOOT.BIN=FreeDOS
The problem is you gave almost no information on what's going on. How
had you created partition? How had you installed FreeDOS and what drive
was selected during install? What happened after install? What happened
after you added
Internet protocol stuff was never my strong suit, but after installing a
driver(broadcom) and starting the dos port of dillo, I realized I could not
download. It says dpid not right sees only http.
Question: in,say, firefox you can save a page, but I believe if it is not
an html specimen it is
Thanks :-) It does something ... upload doesn't work (in Win32 version
it works with minor trouble) ... HTTPS doesn't work ... posting in
FASM forum works (without attachments only) ... FTP is strange ...
and there are hangers (temporary and permanent) ...
Here is a screenshot of Dillo for DOS running
Another one (shot in DOS but uploaded in Windaube):
http://board.flatassembler.net/files/d_948.png
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains
Thanks for posting a screenshot of Dillo visiting www.freedos.org. Just
curious, does the rest of the FreeDOS site render correctly on Dillo? I use
standard HTML CSS, but does Dillo have support for the CSS directives I'm
using?
I haven't had time to tinker with Dillo yet, but maybe you could
Just curious, does the rest of the FreeDOS site render correctly on Dillo?
The stuff on the left side is far below (bad, not visible on the
shot), no further tests.
FASM forum (php-BB2) looks good (as long as no big images inside) but
produces warns after posting ... php-BB3 looks a bit messy.