[Freedos-user] no sibject

2013-06-06 Thread James Collins
http://www.anmadara.de/jadzrezs/glpwaxqayfqzx.htm -- How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views

[Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-06 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:21 PM, James Collins wrote: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic) Just for the record, here's "yet another" poor Yahoo! sap who's been compromised by spammers. Sad, but oh well, what can you do? (Change your password or use a different provider, I guess.

Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-06 Thread Chris Evans
The privacy of yahoo email users will decrease on July 1st when yahoo will begin more aggressive ad scanning of your messages stored on their servers. I even noticed a new ad format that looks like it is part of your inbox list but its a sponsered ad. I would recommend switching to other providers

Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-06 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, AFAIK, Google's machines (not people) automatically scan your messages to better target ads at you. They don't keep any private data (or at least not beyond minimal legal limits). My ISP is AT&T, formerly Bellsouth (whom AT&T bought out, among others). Even they (Bellsouth branch) switched

Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-06 Thread dmccunney
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Chris Evans wrote: > I wouldn't recommend gmail as google scans your messages too. > Http://digitalatoll.com offers email that is private and secure but is not > free. I personally don't *care* that Google scans my mail. The scanning is done by algorithms, not h

Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam

2013-06-06 Thread Jim Lemon
On 06/07/2013 01:41 PM, dmccunney wrote: > ... > "You *wish* you were > important enough that anyone could be *bothered* to pay that sort of > attention to you. You aren't and they don't." > Warhol deconstructed. I like it. Jim ---

Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-06 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:41 PM, dmccunney wrote: > > My usual response to worries about privacy is "You *wish* you were > important enough that anyone could be *bothered* to pay that sort of > attention to you. You aren't and they don't." http://www.osnews.com/story/27101/NSA_collects_phon