On 4 june Bernd Blaauw wrote:
>...
>Still not looked at that DOS PDF reader that was posted a while ago, but
>it could be a good addition.
>...
Where and when was it posted ?
--
Simplify data backup and recovery for yo
On 05 Oct 2011 Alain Mouette said:
>I had problems with networking in dos for a few users, a short time ago.
>After a lot of headache, I discovered that those were conections via
>ADSL that used PPPoE, which has a 28 bytes overhead.
Would you please tell how they implement this (ADSL in DOS)
Rugxulo said in freedos-devel:
> It's UPX'd. ...
>
> 92531 -> 65846 71.16% dos/exe COMMAND.COM
What command.com program do you refer to ?
That I use with FreeDOS (I downloaded it from ftp.ibiblio.org)
is 93963 bytes long and has no UPX signature in it.
Alex said in freedos-us
On 9 april Bernd Blaauw said:
>muPDF was ported a while ago, listed on BTTR forums somewhere.
muPDF is a Windows program that will (at least its non-graphics
parts) run under Japheth's HX DOS extender, in a powerful enough
machine. Since the minimum requirements to do so are much like
the min
Michael B. Brutman said:
> If you have an idea let me know. I can't get to everything,
> but if the idea is good it will definitely get priority.
> Small tweaks to the existing code are always possible to.
My wishes:
1) Support for class 6 packet drivers
2) TCP/IP packet logging capability
3)
Bernd Blaauw said:
> P.S.- How exactly do I reply to the posts on the FreeDOS-User group? I
> use gmail.
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
> Enter your Gmail address there and pick some password, preferably a
> unique one, thus different from your email password.
No
A question to Blair Campbell:
Did you install aspi.sys over xcdrom.sys ? Would you please show the
proper lines in your config.sys ?
--
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering We
A question to Oleg O. Chukaev:
You said
>Blair Campbell wrote:
does ASPI.SYS by Oak require a ATAPI driver
to be loaded first?
>>> No. Programs like cdrecord and readcd can work
>>> without an ATAPI driver.
>> No they can't if you're using an ATAPI drive.
>They CAN. ;-) Yesterday I succe
Blair Campbell said:
> I first loaded xgcdrom as usual, then loaded
> aspi.sys after
> (http://www.wolfgang-brinkmann.de/bcdw/aspi.sys),
> and used wodim to record (on my homepage at
> http://blairdude.googlepages.com/cdrkit)
Thank you for the help, but I still would
like to know what Oleg O.
Blair Campbell said:
>Did you load aspi.sys after xcdrom?
Yes, and it did create a new DOS character device:
SCSIMGR$
>Try running wodim -scanbus and see if it finds your
>drive.
>You might need to specify dev=3Dx,x,x
>to tell it which drive to use.
Running wodim -scanbus results (after
Robert Riebisch wrote:
>dos386 wrote:
>>> But there is a tool which has the name DISPLAY and
>> There are simply too many DISPLAY's ...
>> I mean the one from 1998 by ???
>> done with DGJPP closed source freeware
>??? = Jih-Shin Ho
This is available from any Simtel mirror /simtelnet/msdos/gr
FreeDOS (kernel=2038fat16, freecom=082pl3) reports a wrong
(about 10% actual) size for a EMS ramdisk created with
Frank Uberto FU_RD v.19i.
Running CHKDSK on this disk reports a large number
of lost chains.
After some use, the dir command returns garbage,
albeit the files put in are still th
Jeremy said:
>Does this happen for any size or what size do you create?
I only tested it with 4364KB, which is the same size I use under
DR/MS DOS. This is just a value I found to work comfortably for
all my ordinary applications. I may try other values if you think
this is important. BTW, I h
Bart Oldeman said:
> I see no problem here
> What are you seeing? How do you load emsdsk? What is a minimal
> config.sys/autoexec.bat that exposes the problem? In other words,
> how can others reproduce your problem?
I load it in config.sys :
DEVICE=C:\DEVS\RDOSUMB.COM #19 *
DEVICEHIGH=C:\DEVS\
Eric Auer said:
>I do not know how DOSLFN interacts with CHKDSK and whether
>we are talking about errors created by DOSLFN alone and
>detected by CHKDSK later or about errors created by some
>effect of having DOSLFN loaded why CHKDSK runs but...
The errors could not be the long names themselves t
Karen Llewellen said:
> I have a wonderful dsl connection now in dos
> using ms dos 7.1, pure not under windows of course,
> and wattcp applications most notably ssh2021b
> which lets me telnet to my shell service shellworld.net
> Having dreadful success with doslynx, even though I
> use lynx
Karen LLewellen said:
>those dos ports will be great if they are configured to use either the
>16 or 32 bit editions of wattcp.
AFAIK, they are compiled with wattcp-32
> Do those ports include streaming audio or Internet radio options? I saw
>hints in library documentation that such can be don
I used XCDROM and SHSUCDX 3.03D for some months
(since their release) in this computer without problems,
mostly under DRDOS, but a few times also under MSDOS and
FREEDOS. This machine does not have any other O/S; uses
only DOS.
I experimented them lately in another machine, which
uses Windows 98
Karen Lewellen said:
> really? I have no trouble say running a CD in
> the background while I use wordperfect to create
> a document and go on line for research.
AFAIK, the first part is no surprise, for a CD drive
can play music almost autonomously, once started. But
how do you manage to do
Eric said:
>I assume that Desqview is also closely linked to some
>high end version of EMM386, probably QEMM386. Both the
>QEMM386 and Desqview were quite complex - and non-free.
AFAIK, Desqview would run even in a 8088. It did
swap processes and their contexts into and out from
DOS (low) memory
Boa noite, Marcos
It has been said in this list:
>> (Mateusz)
>> Simple: FAT16 doesn't support partitions bigger than 2GiB.
>> So, you have to choose:
>> - either you are sticking to FAT32
>> - or you use only 2GiB partitions (for eg. 2 or 3 partitions on the drive,
>> with each one having 2GiB m
Liam Proven wrote:
>Ahh, OK. Fair enough, that makes sense. The "legal"
>layout for DOS, then, would be:
> 1 primary partition
> 1 extended partition
> \
> [logical drive][logical drive]
> Don't try to create 3 primary partitions - in DOS
>terms, that is an illegal layout.
Interestingly, i
Recently posted in this list:
>(Alain Mouette)
>No it has never been illegal, and it always worked
>just fine. I use these since forever... what happened
>is that most tools did not have a way of making them,
>but if you know how to make them it allways worked
>since MSDOS-3.
>(Liam Proven)
>
Marcos:
Please excuse me if I underestimate your knowledge.
Are you sure the BIOS of your computers supports LBA
with the cluster size you choose? Some older machines
(e.g. this) require an specific cluster size in order
to use LBA.
Regards
JAS
-
Christian Masloch said:
> The BIOS doesn't know anything about cluster sizes.
> Maybe you mean sector sizes? Almost all floppy and
> hard disks have a sector size of 512 byte. Expect
> problems with hardware, firmware and/or software
> if that is not the case.
I mean the BIOS in the machine
25 matches
Mail list logo
