Re: [Freedos-user] "Peace and Quiet"!

2009-06-21 Thread Eric Auer

Hi!

> needed to support some.  If Dos based Windows is
> used, Freedos is possibly being run on a computer
> that has 128+ megs of RAM.  There are a LOT of
> old computers that have this much RAM.

And several operating systems that can run there ;-)

> Freedos can ask, "Are you on a Pentium, 486, 386, 286,
> or 8088," at install time.  Based off of that info...

You typically install from CD today, so you can assume
a 386 or better, often Pentium or better CPU. Many apps
run on 8086, but to have decent memory management, you
typically want HIMEMX and a 386. Several drivers also
require that. There are also floppy distros for 8086.
I would not put too much extra 8086 fiddling inside a
CD distro installer if you ask me. Almost no apps need
a more modern CPU than 386, or would gain from a FPU.
Well, probably Arachne would... I also think FreeBASIC
had issues with 486sx and older CPU which lack a FPU.

> is possible to decide whether or not certain programs
> like Firefox for example make any sense.  I seriously 
> doubt that anyone wants to run Arachne on anything less 
> than a 486 with at least 2 megs of RAM for example.

On any PC which is too old to run NT or Linux, you
probably want Dillo and not Firefox anyway... ;-)

Interestingly, Firefox depends mostly on GTK, Python
and Cairo. Python 2.4 already exists for DOS DJGPP.
Cairo has backends for GTK and Win32, but Nokia did
help with some QPainter backend for QT. It makes me
wonder how hard writing a VESA framebuffer backend
for DOS might be. On the other hand, I really wonder
how far HX is from running older Firefox for Win32.

Note that while DOS runs on modern hardware, it
does not necessarily make use of it. There is
no surround sound, multi-core, more-than-4-GB-
of-RAM or similar support, but it does not hurt
to have that hardware while running DOS either.

> of Linux that installs to a FAT directory and
> exits to Freedos when you are done would be fine

On the other hand, switching THAT way would not
be much faster than rebooting to DOS either ;-)

> In short, the state of Freedos's Arachne poses a
> security problem for anyone who needs to make sure
> that a graphical web browser has a local filter

You cannot install censorship in any DOS browser
because in DOS, every user always is the admin.

> Sure you might filter at the router to the net

That would be morer secure indeed.

Eric



--
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] "Peace and Quiet"!

2009-06-20 Thread Michael Robinson
I never intended to start a WAR over Arachne and coming 
up with a Windows replacement.

I would like to see Arachne, because it's graphical 
and there are no filter plugins for it, moved from the 
Freedos ditribution to say an extras respository.  I 
can't install procon:latte to Arachne, which is an over 
effective filter for Firefox 2.x and later.  Lynx isn't 
a problem because it isn't graphical where there might 
be a desire to support reading simple text web pages 
that are local to the Freedos machine.  MS DOS was 
never networked out of the box where Freedos to be 
like it should not be either.  All of the network 
programs, except lynx, can be put into an extra 
repository that can be distributed on a separate CD.

As far as a Windows replacement, a couple of comments:
Dos based Windows is not necessary to support all of
the programs I listed, W3D and Blake Stone work
if you have a new enough version of them, but it is 
needed to support some.  If Dos based Windows is
used, Freedos is possibly being run on a computer
that has 128+ megs of RAM.  There are a LOT of
old computers that have this much RAM.  Even more if
you include 486s with 64 megs of RAM.  A Pentium III
450 can certainly run XP, but I don't recommend that.
Making a list of what is lost if you don't have Dos
based Windows is not a bad idea.  People think of
Dos, Windows has been popular since at least MS-DOS
3.3 where few programs were written when Windows was
popular to run in straight Dos.

A Windows replacement does not necessarily need to be
Windows compatible.  Opengem is technically a Windows
replacement, it just isn't one that replaces say the
web browsers that people typically ran in Windows 98.

MS Dos existed all the way up to the Pentium which
typically had 128 megs of RAM or more.  That 128
meg Pentium is your typical Windows 98 machine.
Freedos can ask, "Are you on a Pentium, 486, 386, 286,
or 8088," at install time.  Based off of that info, it
is possible to decide whether or not certain programs
like Firefox for example make any sense.  I seriously 
doubt that anyone wants to run Arachne on anything less 
than a 486 with at least 2 megs of RAM for example.

If I am not mistaken, Freedos is being designed to 
work on everything from yesterday's computer to 
today's multi core 64 bit system.  Why not?  If 
Freedos is being run natively on a multi core 
computer, running a GUI that can support Firefox 
when there is more than a GIG of RAM to work with 
seems like no big deal.  Certainly on a computer 
like that one can reboot to Linux or relegate 
Freedos to an emulated environment, but it would 
be nice if you didn't have to do that.  A version
of Linux that installs to a FAT directory and
exits to Freedos when you are done would be 
fine.  There is such a thing as the UMSDOS file 
system which Linux can be installed to, though 
I don't know of any modern Linux distributions 
that install this way.

A Windows replacement that is Windows compatible is
certainly a separate project.  I have always been
curious why the FreeWin95 project failed.  A project
to build a GUI that will run Firefox which can sit
on top of Freedos might be simpler than a project 
to clone Windows 9x in entirety.

In short, the state of Freedos's Arachne poses a
security problem for anyone who needs to make sure
that a graphical web browser has a local filter on
it.  Sure you might filter at the router to the 
Net, but that isn't always the case.

On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 08:20 -0700, Jack wrote:
> To all involved in the recent "Arachne" and "Windows" threads:
> 
> Look, you guys!   We need "peace and quiet" on this and on all
> DOS forums, if DOS is to survive!   Take it from a 63-year-old
> who has been in more than my own share of "wars", like many of
> you know, and which I regret for the damage to DOS they did.
> 
> DOS is dying.   Some may say no, but I "sense" it is used much
> less than before, in part due to all the arguments on this and
> other forums among people who still do use DOS.   My goal now,
> for UIDE and all my drivers, is to make them the best possible
> so DOS will SURVIVE!   To this end, (A) they are again offered
> to all, (B) their sources are again available, and (C) I shall
> work with anybody and EVERYBODY to make them better!
> 
> Japheth helped me speed-up UIDE in "protected mode" and I sent
> him a "stripped" UIDEJR he can use to upgrade XDMA32/XCDROM32.
> He is busy with JWASM, but if he ever updates his JLM drivers,
> [for which I am NOT expert-enough in "protected mode"], I will
> help him all I can!   Bernd Blaauw wanted changes to UIDE that
> help his automatic "scripts", and he got them!   I am changing
> RDISK from a .SYS to a .COM file, which will then allow a user
> specified drive letter when loaded thru the AUTOEXEC.BAT file.
> [Not possible in CONFIG.SYS, a "long story" why!].Anything
> else I can think of, I will do!
> 
> If I can do all that, so can all of you.   Let's end the WARS,
> and do our best to k

[Freedos-user] "Peace and Quiet"!

2009-06-20 Thread Jack

To all involved in the recent "Arachne" and "Windows" threads:

Look, you guys!   We need "peace and quiet" on this and on all
DOS forums, if DOS is to survive!   Take it from a 63-year-old
who has been in more than my own share of "wars", like many of
you know, and which I regret for the damage to DOS they did.

DOS is dying.   Some may say no, but I "sense" it is used much
less than before, in part due to all the arguments on this and
other forums among people who still do use DOS.   My goal now,
for UIDE and all my drivers, is to make them the best possible
so DOS will SURVIVE!   To this end, (A) they are again offered
to all, (B) their sources are again available, and (C) I shall
work with anybody and EVERYBODY to make them better!

Japheth helped me speed-up UIDE in "protected mode" and I sent
him a "stripped" UIDEJR he can use to upgrade XDMA32/XCDROM32.
He is busy with JWASM, but if he ever updates his JLM drivers,
[for which I am NOT expert-enough in "protected mode"], I will
help him all I can!   Bernd Blaauw wanted changes to UIDE that
help his automatic "scripts", and he got them!   I am changing
RDISK from a .SYS to a .COM file, which will then allow a user
specified drive letter when loaded thru the AUTOEXEC.BAT file.
[Not possible in CONFIG.SYS, a "long story" why!].Anything
else I can think of, I will do!

If I can do all that, so can all of you.   Let's end the WARS,
and do our best to keep ALL versions of DOS alive!

Jack R. Ellis


--
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user