Re: [Freedos-user] Whatever happened to freedos-32?

2009-09-02 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi,

Well, at least while those fancy 64-bit processors start at 16-bit,
and have a 32-bit mode that can run tasks in the V86 mode, we are
safe.
I wonder, however, what will happen once Microsoft start releasing
Windows only in the x64 flavour (and drop the x86), and something
happens about our old 16-bit BIOS (EFI?).

Regards,
Aitor


2009/8/13 King InuYasha :
> As far as I can tell, the last commit in the SVN for the project was in
> 2007, so it's either abandoned, in hiatus, or going so slowly that no
> commits have been pushed through in the last two years.
> Remaking the FreeDOS kernel to be 32-bit might be rather significant, or
> even to 64-bit, since we are starting to see quite a few 64-bit processors.
> The only problem with a 64-bit FreeDOS kernel is figuring out how to deal
> with 16-bit applications. I'd say the best option would be to add a
> driver/module that would do the exact same thing as user-mode QEMU on Linux:
> emulate a processor and load it in a hybrid environment.
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Michael Robinson 
> wrote:
>>
>> There was an effort to create a 32 bit version of freedos with memory
>> protection and possibly some other features.  What is happening with
>> this project?  I'm just curious is all.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008
>> 30-Day
>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
>> on
>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
>> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
>> ___
>> Freedos-user mailing list
>> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>
>
> --
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
> on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> ___
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>
>

--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Whatever happened to freedos-32?

2009-08-14 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 14-8-2009 13:13, MegaBrutal schreef:
> Who ever needs a 64-bit version of DOS, especially if you need to
> emulate an entire processor while achieving it?
>
> 32-bit is just fine. I don't know why would anyone switch to 64-bit
> for DOS, since people don't even use the advantages out.
>
> Of course, experimenting with 64-bit is still cool! ;)
>
a Ramdrive that can be larger than 4GB or access beyond 4GB would be 
nice, requiring some 64bit challenges I think. Got 6GB in this machine 
at the moment.


--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Whatever happened to freedos-32?

2009-08-14 Thread MegaBrutal
2009/8/13 King InuYasha :
> Remaking the FreeDOS kernel to be 32-bit might be rather significant, or
> even to 64-bit, since we are starting to see quite a few 64-bit processors.
> The only problem with a 64-bit FreeDOS kernel is figuring out how to deal
> with 16-bit applications. I'd say the best option would be to add a
> driver/module that would do the exact same thing as user-mode QEMU on Linux:
> emulate a processor and load it in a hybrid environment.

Who ever needs a 64-bit version of DOS, especially if you need to
emulate an entire processor while achieving it?

32-bit is just fine. I don't know why would anyone switch to 64-bit
for DOS, since people don't even use the advantages out.

Of course, experimenting with 64-bit is still cool! ;)

--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Whatever happened to freedos-32?

2009-08-13 Thread King InuYasha
Wouldn't it have been smarter to request a relicense to LGPL for FreeDOS-32?
That would fix his problems

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Christian Masloch wrote:

> > As far as I can tell, the last commit in the SVN for the project was in
> > 2007, so it's either abandoned, in hiatus, or going so slowly that no
> > commits have been pushed through in the last two years.
>
> I contacted Salvo a year or so ago and he said there's still work on a new
> version which will replace the current one. Here's what he wrote me:
>
> Salvo Isaja, 2008-05-27:
> > Now proceeding with very slow pace and restarting since the very
> > beginning, mainly due to licensing issues (i.e. the GPL is
> > unadeguate).
>
> [note that the GPL is the license of OSLib, not LGPL]
>
> Reading some old mailing list archives I found, I think it's something
> about the licensing of OSLib. As previously discussed in the BTTR Software
> forum, DOS-C (The FreeDOS Kernel) possibly violates the GPL by allowing to
> load non-GPL DOS device drivers. Now in FreeDOS-32's architecture the
> native drivers and applications are linked into the kernel or something,
> so the OSLib guy said they all have to be licensed under the GPL too when
> using OSLib.
>
> Regards,
> Christian
>
>
> --
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
> on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> ___
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Whatever happened to freedos-32?

2009-08-13 Thread Christian Masloch
> As far as I can tell, the last commit in the SVN for the project was in
> 2007, so it's either abandoned, in hiatus, or going so slowly that no
> commits have been pushed through in the last two years.

I contacted Salvo a year or so ago and he said there's still work on a new  
version which will replace the current one. Here's what he wrote me:

Salvo Isaja, 2008-05-27:
> Now proceeding with very slow pace and restarting since the very
> beginning, mainly due to licensing issues (i.e. the GPL is
> unadeguate).

[note that the GPL is the license of OSLib, not LGPL]

Reading some old mailing list archives I found, I think it's something  
about the licensing of OSLib. As previously discussed in the BTTR Software  
forum, DOS-C (The FreeDOS Kernel) possibly violates the GPL by allowing to  
load non-GPL DOS device drivers. Now in FreeDOS-32's architecture the  
native drivers and applications are linked into the kernel or something,  
so the OSLib guy said they all have to be licensed under the GPL too when  
using OSLib.

Regards,
Christian

--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Whatever happened to freedos-32?

2009-08-12 Thread King InuYasha
As far as I can tell, the last commit in the SVN for the project was in
2007, so it's either abandoned, in hiatus, or going so slowly that no
commits have been pushed through in the last two years.
Remaking the FreeDOS kernel to be 32-bit might be rather significant, or
even to 64-bit, since we are starting to see quite a few 64-bit processors.
The only problem with a 64-bit FreeDOS kernel is figuring out how to deal
with 16-bit applications. I'd say the best option would be to add a
driver/module that would do the exact same thing as user-mode QEMU on Linux:
emulate a processor and load it in a hybrid environment.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Michael Robinson
wrote:

> There was an effort to create a 32 bit version of freedos with memory
> protection and possibly some other features.  What is happening with
> this project?  I'm just curious is all.
>
>
>
> --
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
> on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> ___
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


[Freedos-user] Whatever happened to freedos-32?

2009-08-12 Thread Michael Robinson
There was an effort to create a 32 bit version of freedos with memory
protection and possibly some other features.  What is happening with
this project?  I'm just curious is all.


--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user