Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-02-13 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
(Un)fortunately, FAT is so inherent to DOS in a way that no block 
devices can host other fs (all the rest are "network file systems"), 
that I doubt that these ideas, yet if marvelous, are hardly possible.


Aitor

Christian Voß escribió:

Hi,
 
I can't understand the crying about the FAT patent. In the whole "world" 
of file systems are enough candidates to replace the Grandma of file 
systems. And most of them are free. I.e. HFS and HFS+ (the file systems 
of MacOS) are GPL and is supported by the linux distros for free. Ok, on 
Windows there are only commercial solutions but it is a option. And the 
ReiserFS is also free.
And perhaps someone create solutions for DOSes because FAT isn't free 
anymore. This can be the beginning of a better FreeDOS :-)



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-01-19 Thread Carl Spitzer
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 20:22 -0500, ultramancool wrote:
> And of course the most important part: to scare the open source 
> community into thinking they can't use FAT anymore. ;-)

Doesnt FAt come from cpm and therefore prior art?  Remember American
judges are often dumber than a box of rocks.

CWSIV



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-01-12 Thread Derek Newhall
--- Christian Voß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I can't understand the crying about the FAT patent.
> In the whole "world" of
> file systems are enough candidates to replace the
> Grandma of file systems.
> And most of them are free. I.e. HFS and HFS+ (the
> file systems of MacOS) are
> GPL and is supported by the linux distros for free.
> Ok, on Windows there are
> only commercial solutions but it is a option. And
> the ReiserFS is also free.
> And perhaps someone create solutions for DOSes
> because FAT isn't free
> anymore. This can be the beginning of a better
> FreeDOS :-)
> 

Umm... the whole point of FreeDOS is to be MS-DOS
compatible. Implementing anything other than FAT as
the primary file system is going against the whole
intent of the project.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-01-12 Thread ultramancool

Andre Tertling wrote:
If I read the patents in question right, they are not exactly "FAT" 
patents but rather "LFN for FAT" patents. The primary reason for the 
patents is to cut a nice slice from the memory stick/card market for M$.


FAT has one large benefit: Because it is so simple, it is easy to 
implement on low-end hardware. One doesn't need much processor power 
or (even more crucial) ram to handle FAT. Ext2/3/reiserfs offer much 
more than FAT but are also much more demanding in terms of internal 
data structure management.


Best regards,
Andre


BIAF wrote:
I Agree, things like this will only make the FreeDOS crew rebell with 
new

FS, MS are doing them selfs no favours at all with this move.

But its been on the brew for along time, maybe they will not do much 
about

it now.

I can't understand the crying about the FAT patent. In the whole 
"world" of
file systems are enough candidates to replace the Grandma of file 
systems.
And most of them are free. I.e. HFS and HFS+ (the file systems of 
MacOS)
are GPL and is supported by the linux distros for free. Ok, on 
Windows there
are only commercial solutions but it is a option. And the ReiserFS 
is also

free.
And perhaps someone create solutions for DOSes because FAT isn't free
anymore. This can be the beginning of a better FreeDOS :-)



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log 
files

for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
And of course the most important part: to scare the open source 
community into thinking they can't use FAT anymore. ;-)



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-01-12 Thread Andre Tertling
If I read the patents in question right, they are not exactly "FAT" 
patents but rather "LFN for FAT" patents. The primary reason for the 
patents is to cut a nice slice from the memory stick/card market for M$.


FAT has one large benefit: Because it is so simple, it is easy to 
implement on low-end hardware. One doesn't need much processor power or 
(even more crucial) ram to handle FAT. Ext2/3/reiserfs offer much more 
than FAT but are also much more demanding in terms of internal data 
structure management.


Best regards,
Andre


BIAF wrote:

I Agree, things like this will only make the FreeDOS crew rebell with new
FS, MS are doing them selfs no favours at all with this move.

But its been on the brew for along time, maybe they will not do much about
it now.


I can't understand the crying about the FAT patent. In the whole "world" of
file systems are enough candidates to replace the Grandma of file systems.
And most of them are free. I.e. HFS and HFS+ (the file systems of MacOS)
are GPL and is supported by the linux distros for free. Ok, on Windows there
are only commercial solutions but it is a option. And the ReiserFS is also
free.
And perhaps someone create solutions for DOSes because FAT isn't free
anymore. This can be the beginning of a better FreeDOS :-)



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FAT Patents of Microsoft

2006-01-12 Thread BIAF
I Agree, things like this will only make the FreeDOS crew rebell with new
FS, MS are doing them selfs no favours at all with this move.

But its been on the brew for along time, maybe they will not do much about
it now.

>Hi,

>I can't understand the crying about the FAT patent. In the whole "world" of
>file systems are enough candidates to replace the Grandma of file systems.
>And most of them are free. I.e. HFS and HFS+ (the file systems of MacOS)
are
>GPL and is supported by the linux distros for free. Ok, on Windows there
are
>only commercial solutions but it is a option. And the ReiserFS is also
free.
>And perhaps someone create solutions for DOSes because FAT isn't free
>anymore. This can be the beginning of a better FreeDOS :-)


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user