Re: [Freedos-user] features of FreeDOS vs. MS/PC-DOS: roadmap ideas

2004-07-19 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 19-Июл-2004 14:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> FD-HIMEM under FreeDOS uses 2.03k of low memory, MS-HIMEM - 47.8k. Ant >>this is not much more, than 1.14k of MS-HIMEM under MS-DOS. BB> as told, the 47.8KB usage is a bug in MS's kernel (IO.SYS , dos 7.10,

Re: [Freedos-user] features of FreeDOS vs. MS/PC-DOS: roadmap ideas

2004-07-19 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Arkady V.Belousov schreef: EA> is at best simplistic (okay, ClamAV ClamScan is not ;-)), EA> our HIMEM does not load parts of itself to HMA, FD-HIMEM under FreeDOS uses 2.03k of low memory, MS-HIMEM - 47.8k. Ant this is not much more, than 1.14k of MS-HIMEM under MS-DOS. EA> make HIMEM load par

Re: [Freedos-user] features of FreeDOS vs. MS/PC-DOS: roadmap ideas

2004-07-19 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Steve Nickolas - Using Windoze escribió: Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote: Hi, Eric Auer escribió: I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS does not have one either. Everybody agrees? Personally I agree. I think MS-DOS 6.20+ is the only DOS with a surface scanner? DR-DOS

Re: [Freedos-user] features of FreeDOS vs. MS/PC-DOS: roadmap ideas

2004-07-19 Thread Johnson Lam
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:35:06 +0200, you wrote: Hi, >>I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS >>does not have one either. >> >Everybody agrees? Scandisk can be later, but the CHKDSK or DOSFSCK still have FAT32 problem. IMO at least one program should work correctly. R

Re: [Freedos-user] features of FreeDOS vs. MS/PC-DOS: roadmap ideas

2004-07-19 Thread Steve Nickolas - Using Windoze
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote: Hi, Eric Auer escribió: I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS does not have one either. Everybody agrees? Personally I agree. I think MS-DOS 6.20+ is the only DOS with a surface scanner? DR-DOS 7, does it have one? PC DOS 7 certainly d

Re: [Freedos-user] features of FreeDOS vs. MS/PC-DOS: roadmap ideas

2004-07-19 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Eric Auer escribió: I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS does not have one either. Everybody agrees? PS: Shrinking DISPLAY to half size should be easy (it now has 2 buffers for each font size I think), just let the 2nd buffer reside e.g. in XMS. Changes are on

Re: [Freedos-user] features of FreeDOS vs. MS/PC-DOS: roadmap ideas

2004-07-19 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 19-Июл-2004 03:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: EA> is at best simplistic (okay, ClamAV ClamScan is not ;-)), EA> our HIMEM does not load parts of itself to HMA, FD-HIMEM under FreeDOS uses 2.03k of low memory, MS-HIMEM - 47.8k. Ant this is not much more, tha