tree/branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
branch HEAD: 1c6c4f42b3de4f18ea96d62950d0e266ca35a055 Add linux-next specific
files for 20220929
Error/Warning reports:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202209150141.wgbakqmx-...@intel.com
https
Hi,
On 2022/9/30 4:38, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 4:51 AM Akhil P Oommen wrote:
On 9/29/2022 3:00 PM, Yang Yingliang wrote:
I got the compile error:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c: In function ‘can_block’:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c:29:21: error:
On 9/12/2022 12:25 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 12/09/2022 22:21, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
On 9/12/2022 11:39 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 12/09/2022 19:23, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
DOWNSPREAD_CTRL (0x107) shall be cleared to 0 upon power-on reset or an
upstream device disconnect. This patch
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 4:51 AM Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>
> On 9/29/2022 3:00 PM, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> > I got the compile error:
> >
> >drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c: In function ‘can_block’:
> >drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c:29:21: error: ‘__GFP_ATOMIC’
> > undeclared
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:36:11 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Add DPU and MDSS schemas to describe MDSS and DPU blocks on the Qualcomm
> SM8250 platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> .../bindings/display/msm/mdss-common.yaml | 4 +-
>
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:36:10 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Add missing device nodes (DSI, PHYs, DP/eDP) to the existing MDSS
> schemas.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> .../display/msm/qcom,msm8998-mdss.yaml| 153 +
> .../display/msm/qcom,qcm2290-mdss.yaml|
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:36:09 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> In order to make the schema more readable, split dpu-qcm2290 into the DPU
> and MDSS parts, each one describing just a single device binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> .../bindings/display/msm/dpu-qcm2290.yaml |
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:36:08 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> In order to make the schema more readable, split dpu-msm8998 into the DPU
> and MDSS parts, each one describing just a single device binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> .../display/msm/qcom,msm8998-dpu.yaml |
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 3:41 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> The introduction of 025d27239a2f exposes a problem with f371bcc0c2ac, in
> that we need to keep the object pinned in the time the submit is queued
> up in the gpu scheduler. Otherwise the shrinker will see it as a thing
>
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:36:07 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> In order to make the schema more readable, split dpu-sdm845 into the DPU
> and MDSS parts, each one describing just a single device binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> .../bindings/display/msm/dpu-sdm845.yaml |
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:36:06 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> In order to make the schema more readable, split dpu-sc7280 into the DPU
> and MDSS parts, each one describing just a single device binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> .../bindings/display/msm/dpu-sc7280.yaml |
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:36:05 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> In order to make the schema more readable, split dpu-sc7180 into the DPU
> and MDSS parts, each one describing just a single device binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> .../bindings/display/msm/dpu-sc7180.yaml |
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:36:04 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Move properties common to all MDSS DT nodes to the mdss-common.yaml.
>
> This extends qcom,msm8998-mdss schema to allow interconnect nodes, which
> will be added later, once msm8998 gains interconnect support.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:36:03 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Move properties common to all DPU DT nodes to the dpu-common.yaml.
>
> Note, this removes description of individual DPU port@ nodes. However
> such definitions add no additional value. The reg values do not
> correspond to hardware
On 9/29/22 09:14, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> 9178e3dcb121 ("mm: discard __GFP_ATOMIC") removed __GFP_ATOMIC,
> replacing it with a check for not __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM.
>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
Acked-by: Randy
From: Rob Clark
9178e3dcb121 ("mm: discard __GFP_ATOMIC") removed __GFP_ATOMIC,
replacing it with a check for not __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
Sorry, this was reported by Stephen earlier in the month, while
I was
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:16 AM Kalyan Thota wrote:
>
> Flush mechanism for DSPP blocks has changed in sc7280 family, it
> allows individual sub blocks to be flushed in coordination with
> master flush control.
>
> Representation: master_flush && (PCC_flush | IGC_flush .. etc )
>
> This
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:09 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 8:10 AM Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 9/28/22 12:26, broo...@kernel.org wrote:
> > > Changes since 20220927:
> > >
> >
> > on x86_64:
> >
> > ../drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c: In function ‘can_block’:
>
Hi folks,
We are excited to welcome you in person to the 2022 X.Org Developers
Conference, held in conjunction with WineConf and FOSS XR conference.
The conference will start officially on Tuesday morning, October 4th.
The program is here:
On 9/29/2022 3:00 PM, Yang Yingliang wrote:
I got the compile error:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c: In function ‘can_block’:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c:29:21: error: ‘__GFP_ATOMIC’
undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘GFP_ATOMIC’?
if
On 24/09/2022 11:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Change HDMI PHY node name from custom 'hdmi-phy' to the generic 'phy'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 24/09/2022 11:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Change HDMI PHY node names from custom 'hdmi-phy' to the generic 'phy'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Best regards,
Krzysztof
I got the compile error:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c: In function ‘can_block’:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c:29:21: error: ‘__GFP_ATOMIC’
undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘GFP_ATOMIC’?
if (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_ATOMIC)
tree/branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
branch HEAD: de90d455a35e474a184c898e66a6a108c3a99434 Add linux-next specific
files for 20220928
Error/Warning reports:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202209150141.wgbakqmx-...@intel.com
24 matches
Mail list logo