On 20/02/2024 22:23, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 20.02.2024 18:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> The patch adding Type-C support for sm6115 was misapplied. All the
>> orientation switch configuration ended up at the UFS PHY node instead of
>> the USB PHY node. Move the data bits to the correct place.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 01:04, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/20/2024 2:42 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 00:40, Abhinav Kumar
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/19/2024 3:52 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 22:36, Abhinav Kumar
> >>> wrote:
On 2/20/2024 2:42 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 00:40, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2/19/2024 3:52 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 22:36, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2/14/2024 11:20 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 20:02, Abhinav
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 00:50, Abel Vesa wrote:
>
> Add the X1E80100 DP descs and compatible. This platform will be using
> a single compatible for both eDP and DP mode. The actual mode will
> be set in devicetree via is-edp flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa
> ---
>
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 00:50, Abel Vesa wrote:
>
> Instead of relying on different compatibles for eDP and DP, use
> the is-edp property from DT to figure out the connector type and
> then pass on that information to the PHY.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
Add the X1E80100 to the list of compatibles and docoment the is-edp
flag. This new flag will be used from now on to dictate the mode from
devicetree, instead of having separate compatibles for eDP and DP.
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa
---
Instead of relying on different compatibles for eDP and DP, use
the is-edp property from DT to figure out the connector type and
then pass on that information to the PHY.
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c| 11 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h| 1
Add the X1E80100 DP descs and compatible. This platform will be using
a single compatible for both eDP and DP mode. The actual mode will
be set in devicetree via is-edp flag.
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff
the PHY know which mode it should configure itself.
The PHY counterpart patchset is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240220-x1e80100-phy-edp-compatible-refactor-v5-0-e8658adf5...@linaro.org/
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa
---
Abel Vesa (3):
dt-bindings: display: msm: dp-controller: document
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 00:40, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/19/2024 3:52 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 22:36, Abhinav Kumar
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/14/2024 11:20 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 20:02, Abhinav Kumar
> >>> wrote:
On 2/19/2024 3:52 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 22:36, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2/14/2024 11:20 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 20:02, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2/8/2024 6:50 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
We have several reports of vblank timeout
On 20.02.2024 18:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The patch adding Type-C support for sm6115 was misapplied. All the
> orientation switch configuration ended up at the UFS PHY node instead of
> the USB PHY node. Move the data bits to the correct place.
>
> Fixes: a06a2f12f9e2 ("arm64: dts: qcom:
Hi Johan
On 2/19/2024 2:41 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 04:14:58PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 02:52:06PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:00:13AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
Since Dmitry had trouble reproducing this issue I
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 21:54, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
> Currently the size parameter of drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() is always
> the size of struct dp_sdp. Hence lets drop this parameter and
> use sizeof() directly.
>
> Suggested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar
> ---
>
intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() can be re-used by other DRM drivers as well.
Lets move this to drm_dp_helper to achieve this.
changes in v2:
- rebased on top of drm-tip
Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar
Acked-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c |
Currently the size parameter of drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() is always
the size of struct dp_sdp. Hence lets drop this parameter and
use sizeof() directly.
Suggested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar
---
drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 8 ++--
On 2/20/2024 11:41 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:27:18AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2/20/2024 11:20 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 21:05, Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 20:53, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM,
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:27:18AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
> On 2/20/2024 11:20 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 21:05, Dmitry Baryshkov
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 20:53, Abhinav Kumar
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM,
On 2/20/2024 11:20 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 21:05, Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 20:53, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() can be
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 21:05, Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 20:53, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Abhinav Kumar
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() can be re-used by
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 21:09, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/20/2024 11:05 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 20:53, Abhinav Kumar
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Abhinav Kumar
> >>>
On 2/20/2024 10:09 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 19:55, Paloma Arellano wrote:
On 2/17/2024 12:56 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 01:03, Paloma Arellano wrote:
+ }
+
+ panel = container_of(dp_panel, struct dp_panel_private, dp_panel);
+
On 2/20/2024 11:05 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 20:53, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() can be re-used by other DRM drivers as well.
Lets move this to
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 20:53, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Abhinav Kumar
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() can be re-used by other DRM drivers as well.
> >> Lets move this to drm_dp_helper to achieve
On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() can be re-used by other DRM drivers as well.
Lets move this to drm_dp_helper to achieve this.
changes in v2:
- rebased on top of drm-tip
Acked-by: Dmitry
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
> intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() can be re-used by other DRM drivers as well.
> Lets move this to drm_dp_helper to achieve this.
>
> changes in v2:
> - rebased on top of drm-tip
>
> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
v1 had an explicit comment
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 19:55, Paloma Arellano wrote:
>
>
> On 2/17/2024 12:56 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 01:03, Paloma Arellano
> > wrote:
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + panel = container_of(dp_panel, struct dp_panel_private, dp_panel);
> >> + catalog =
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:31:04 +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The patch adding Type-C support for sm6115 was misapplied. All the
> orientation switch configuration ended up at the UFS PHY node instead of
> the USB PHY node. Move the data bits to the correct place.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1]
On 2/17/2024 12:56 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 01:03, Paloma Arellano wrote:
Add support to pack and send the VSC SDP packet for DP. This therefore
allows the transmision of format information to the sinks which is
needed for YUV420 support over DP.
Changes in v4:
The patch adding Type-C support for sm6115 was misapplied. All the
orientation switch configuration ended up at the UFS PHY node instead of
the USB PHY node. Move the data bits to the correct place.
Fixes: a06a2f12f9e2 ("arm64: dts: qcom: qrb4210-rb2: enable USB-C port
handling")
Signed-off-by:
(gpu))
gpu->ubwc_config.highest_bank_bit = 13;
---
base-commit: 41c177cf354126a22443b5c80cec9fdd313e67e1
change-id: 20240220-fd-sc7180-explicit-ubwc-40953fa55947
Best regards,
--
Dmitry Baryshkov
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 16:31, Helen Koike wrote:
>
>
>
> On 20/02/2024 09:17, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Bump IGT revision to pick up Rob Clark's fixes for the msm driver:
> >
> > - msm_submit@invalid-duplicate-bo-submit,Fail
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
>
> Do you have a gitlab
On 20/02/2024 09:17, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Bump IGT revision to pick up Rob Clark's fixes for the msm driver:
- msm_submit@invalid-duplicate-bo-submit,Fail
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Do you have a gitlab pipeline link I can check?
Thanks
Helen
---
Add support for MDSS on X1E80100.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c
index 65657230bbff..fab6ad4e5107 100644
Add definitions for the display hardware used on the Qualcomm X1E80100
platform.
Co-developed-by: Abhinav Kumar
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa
---
.../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_2_x1e80100.h | 449 +
This patchset adds support for display for X1E80100.
The support for embedded DisplayPort on this platform will not
be enabled using the connetor type from driver match data,
but through some 'is-edp' property via DT. This subsequent work
will be part of a separate patchset.
Signed-off-by: Abel
Document the MDSS hardware found on the Qualcomm X1E80100 platform.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa
---
.../bindings/display/msm/qcom,x1e80100-mdss.yaml | 251 +
1 file changed, 251 insertions(+)
diff --git
Document the DPU for Qualcomm X1E80100 platform in the SM8650 schema, as
they are similar.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8650-dpu.yaml | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 14:56, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 13:52, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 06:48:30PM +0100, Markus Elfring
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 1:44 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> Historically the Adreno driver has not been updating memory
> configuration registers on a618 (SC7180 platform) implying that the
> default configuration is fine. After the rework performed in the commit
> 8814455a0e54 ("drm/msm:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 13:52, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 06:48:30PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > > > The two device node references taken during allocation
Bump IGT revision to pick up Rob Clark's fixes for the msm driver:
- msm_submit@invalid-duplicate-bo-submit,Fail
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 06:48:30PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > The two device node references taken during allocation need to be
> > > dropped when the auxiliary device is freed.
> > …
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/aux-hpd-bridge.c
> > …
>
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 13:52, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 06:48:30PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > > The two device node references taken during allocation need to be
> > > > dropped when the auxiliary device is freed.
>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:55:57AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > Specifically, the dp-hpd bridge is currently registered before all
> > resources have been acquired which means that it can also be
> > deregistered on probe deferrals.
> >
> > In the meantime there is a race window where the
On 16/02/2024 18:01, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Document the DPU for Qualcomm X1E80100 platform in the SM8650 schema, as
> they are similar.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 19/02/2024 22:37, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 19.02.2024 15:49, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 15:36, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Enable the A702 GPU (also marketed as "3D accelerator by qcom [1], lol).
Is it not?
Sure, every electronic device is also a heater, I suppose.. I
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:28:53AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 11:34 PM Johan Hovold wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:23:40AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > From: Rob Clark
> > >
> > > The brute force iommu_flush_iotlb_all() was good enough for unmap, but
> > > in
48 matches
Mail list logo
