rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/
rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
v2:
- change tag in commit subject of patch 03
- add ack tags
v3:
- fix a compile error in patch 5
v4:
- more ack and review tags
v5:
- more acks
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_i2c.c |1 -
drive
On 23.11.2023 09:19, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 23.11.23 um 08:16 schrieb Heiner Kallweit:
>> On 23.11.2023 07:56, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 20.11.23 um 22:46 schrieb Heiner Kallweit:
>>>> After removal of
On 23.11.2023 07:56, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 20.11.23 um 22:46 schrieb Heiner Kallweit:
>> After removal of the legacy EEPROM driver and I2C_CLASS_DDC support in
>> olpc_dcon there's no i2c client driver left supporting I2C_CLASS_DDC.
>> Class-based d
On 21.11.2023 09:58, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> v4:
>> - more ack and review tags
>
> Please do not send new versions just to record the acks and
> reviews. They should be added while applying the patches.
>
Right, typically al
rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c
index de182c004.
rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
v2:
- change tag in commit subject of patch 03
- add ack tags
v3:
- fix a compile error in patch 5
v4:
- more ack and review tags
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_i2c.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/a
On 19.11.2023 21:48, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 19.11.2023 21:28, Helge Deller wrote:
>> On 11/19/23 12:28, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> After removal of the legacy EEPROM driver and I2C_CLASS_DDC support in
>>> olpc_dcon there's no i2c client driver left supportin
On 19.11.2023 21:28, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 11/19/23 12:28, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> After removal of the legacy EEPROM driver and I2C_CLASS_DDC support in
>> olpc_dcon there's no i2c client driver left supporting I2C_CLASS_DDC.
>> Class-based device auto-detection
rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c
index de182c004..7aa500d24 100644
--- a/drive
rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
v2:
- change tag in commit subject of patch 03
- add ack tags
v3:
- fix a compile error in patch 5
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_i2c.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_d
rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c
index de182c004..7aa500d24 100644
--- a/drive
rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_i2c.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_i2c.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys
rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c
index de182c004..7aa500d24 100644
--- a/drive
rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_i2c.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_i2c.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys
On 13.11.2023 18:49, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> Preferably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
>
> Are we in a hurry here, i.e. does it block further development of the
> i801 smbus driver? My gut feeling says the patches should rather go via
> drm and fbdev trees, but I may be convince
rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_i2c.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_i2c.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys
rably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c
index de182c004..7aa500d24 100644
--- a/drive
18 matches
Mail list logo
