On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:43:51PM -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:33:53AM -0800, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> > On 2018-11-14 07:13, Sean Paul wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:47:22PM -0800, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> > > > On 2018-11-13 12:52, Sean Paul wrote:
> > > > >
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:33:53AM -0800, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> On 2018-11-14 07:13, Sean Paul wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:47:22PM -0800, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> > > On 2018-11-13 12:52, Sean Paul wrote:
> > > > From: Sean Paul
> > > >
> > > > The indirection of registering a
On 2018-11-14 07:13, Sean Paul wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:47:22PM -0800, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
On 2018-11-13 12:52, Sean Paul wrote:
> From: Sean Paul
>
> The indirection of registering a callback and opaque pointer isn't
real
> useful when there's only one callsite. So instead of
On 2018-11-13 12:52, Sean Paul wrote:
From: Sean Paul
The indirection of registering a callback and opaque pointer isn't real
useful when there's only one callsite. So instead of having the
vblank_cb registration, just give encoder a crtc and let it directly
call the vblank handler.
In a
From: Sean Paul
The indirection of registering a callback and opaque pointer isn't real
useful when there's only one callsite. So instead of having the
vblank_cb registration, just give encoder a crtc and let it directly
call the vblank handler.
In a later patch, we'll make use of this further.
