On Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2023 21:46:31 CEST Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> On 6/1/2023 10:00 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > MSM8226 uses a modified PLL lock sequence compared to MSM8974, which is
> > based on the function dsi_pll_enable_seq_m in the msm-3.10 kernel.
> >
> > Worth noting that the msm-3.10
On 6/1/2023 10:00 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
MSM8226 uses a modified PLL lock sequence compared to MSM8974, which is
based on the function dsi_pll_enable_seq_m in the msm-3.10 kernel.
Worth noting that the msm-3.10 downstream kernel also will try other
sequences in case this one doesn't work, but
On 01/06/2023 20:00, Luca Weiss wrote:
MSM8226 uses a modified PLL lock sequence compared to MSM8974, which is
based on the function dsi_pll_enable_seq_m in the msm-3.10 kernel.
Worth noting that the msm-3.10 downstream kernel also will try other
sequences in case this one doesn't work, but
MSM8226 uses a modified PLL lock sequence compared to MSM8974, which is
based on the function dsi_pll_enable_seq_m in the msm-3.10 kernel.
Worth noting that the msm-3.10 downstream kernel also will try other
sequences in case this one doesn't work, but during testing it has shown
that the _m
