On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 05:53:22 +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> There is little point in using %ps to print a value known to be NULL. On
> the other hand it makes sense to print the callback symbol in the
> 'invalid IRQ' message. Correct those two error messages to make more
> sense.
>
>
On 2024-03-30 11:31:37, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2024-03-30 05:53:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > There is little point in using %ps to print a value known to be NULL. On
> > the other hand it makes sense to print the callback symbol in the
> > 'invalid IRQ' message. Correct those two error
On 3/29/2024 8:53 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
There is little point in using %ps to print a value known to be NULL. On
the other hand it makes sense to print the callback symbol in the
'invalid IRQ' message. Correct those two error messages to make more
sense.
Fixes: 6893199183f8
On 2024-03-30 05:53:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> There is little point in using %ps to print a value known to be NULL. On
> the other hand it makes sense to print the callback symbol in the
> 'invalid IRQ' message. Correct those two error messages to make more
> sense.
>
> Fixes: 6893199183f8
