On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
A short commit message detailing the change and info printed would
probably be helpful.
Aside from that,
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
>
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> Sometimes it is nice not to duplicate equivalent printk() and
> seq_printf() code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile| 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c | 54
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> We subclass drm_plane_state, so add mdp5_plane_atomic_print_state() to
> dump out our own driver specific plane state.
>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:08:28AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 07:50:13PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> We had this wired up already internally but initially did not expose the
> >> property pending
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 07:59:51AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 07:55:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> Sometimes it is nice not to duplicate equivalent printk() and
> >> seq_printf() code.
> >>
> >>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 07:55:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> Sometimes it is nice not to duplicate equivalent printk() and
>> seq_printf() code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
>
> Ok, maybe I should