Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: fix the `CRASHDUMP_READ` target of `a6xx_get_shader_block()`

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 at 04:39, Abhinav Kumar wrote: > > > > On 3/26/2024 2:23 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > Clang 14 in an (essentially) defconfig arm64 build for next-20240326 > > reports [1]: > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c:843:6: error: > > variable 'out' set but not

Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH] drm/sched: Convert the GPU scheduler to variable number of run-queues

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 11:46, Luben Tuikov wrote: > > On 2023-10-31 09:33, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > > > On 10/26/23 19:25, Luben Tuikov wrote: > >> On 2023-10-26 12:39, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > >>> On 10/23/23 05:22, Luben Tuikov wrote: > The GPU scheduler has now a variable number of

Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v4 0/9] drm: fdinfo memory stats

| 15 +++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c | 2 - > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h | 10 ++ > > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 7 + > > include/drm/drm_file.h | 51 +++ > > include/drm/drm_gem.h | 32 + > > 13 files changed, 378 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > What is the expected merge plan for this series? msm-next? drm-misc? I'm fine with this going via drm-misc, Acked-by: Dave Airlie if that is the plan. Dave.

Re: [Freedreno] [pull] drm/msm: drm-msm-display-for-6.2

On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 20:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > As agreed with Rob Clark, a pull request for the non-GPU part of the drm/msm > driver. Summary below. > > The following changes since commit 7f7a942c0a338c4a2a7b359bdb2b68e9896122ec: > > Merge tag 'drm-next-20221025' of

[Freedreno] Adding CI results to the kernel tree was Re: [RFC v2] drm/msm: Add initial ci/ subdirectory

> And use it to store expectations about what the drm/msm driver is > supposed to pass in the IGT test suite. I wanted to loop in Linus/Greg to see if there are any issues raised by adding CI results file to the tree in their minds, or if any other subsystem has done this already, and it's all

Re: [Freedreno] [pull] drm/msm: msm-next for 5.10

Assuming I merged it right, 32-bit builds adds warning In file included from /home/airlied/devel/kernel/dim/src/include/linux/bitops.h:5, from /home/airlied/devel/kernel/dim/src/include/linux/kernel.h:12, from

Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v11 1/2] drm/panel: add support for rm69299 visionox panel driver

On Thu, 7 May 2020 at 04:57, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Hi Harigovindan > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:15:14AM +0530, Harigovindan P wrote: > > Add support for Visionox panel driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Harigovindan P > > Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke > > Thanks for your persistence on this. >

Re: [Freedreno] [pull] drm/msm: msm-next for 5.3

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 08:34, Rob Clark wrote: > > Hi Dave, > Naughty naughty rebase. dim: f47bee2ba447 ("drm/msm/a3xx: remove TPL1 regs from snapshot"): Subject in fixes line doesn't match referenced commit: dim: 7198e6b03155 drm/msm: add a3xx gpu support dim: fc19cbb785d7 ("drm/msm/mdp5:

Re: [Freedreno] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm: prefix header search paths with $(srctree)/

Daniel, drm-misc-next-fixes? Dave. On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 12:25, wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dave Airlie [mailto:airl...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 11:19 AM > > To: Yamada, Masahiro/山田 真弘 > > Cc: David

Re: [Freedreno] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH libdrm] drm: Remove create_handle() drm_framebuffer "virtual".

On 9 August 2017 at 09:42, Joe Kniss wrote: > Because all drivers currently use gem objects for framebuffer planes, > the virtual create_handle() is not required. This change adds a > struct drm_gem_object *gems[4] field to drm_framebuffer and removes > create_handle()