Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v2 02/21] drm/armada: Introduce GEM object functions
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:39PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in > struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with > per-instance callbacks in armada. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Acked-by: Russell King Thanks. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c | 3 --- > drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c | 12 +++- > drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.h | 2 -- > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c > index 980d3f1f8f16..22247cfce80b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c > @@ -37,13 +37,10 @@ DEFINE_DRM_GEM_FOPS(armada_drm_fops); > > static struct drm_driver armada_drm_driver = { > .lastclose = drm_fb_helper_lastclose, > - .gem_free_object_unlocked = armada_gem_free_object, > .prime_handle_to_fd = drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd, > .prime_fd_to_handle = drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle, > - .gem_prime_export = armada_gem_prime_export, > .gem_prime_import = armada_gem_prime_import, > .dumb_create= armada_gem_dumb_create, > - .gem_vm_ops = _gem_vm_ops, > .major = 1, > .minor = 0, > .name = "armada-drm", > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c > index ecf8a55e93d9..c343fbefe47c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static vm_fault_t armada_gem_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) > return vmf_insert_pfn(vmf->vma, vmf->address, pfn); > } > > -const struct vm_operations_struct armada_gem_vm_ops = { > +static const struct vm_operations_struct armada_gem_vm_ops = { > .fault = armada_gem_vm_fault, > .open = drm_gem_vm_open, > .close = drm_gem_vm_close, > @@ -184,6 +184,12 @@ armada_gem_map_object(struct drm_device *dev, struct > armada_gem_object *dobj) > return dobj->addr; > } > > +static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs armada_gem_object_funcs = { > + .free = armada_gem_free_object, > + .export = armada_gem_prime_export, > + .vm_ops = _gem_vm_ops, > +}; > + > struct armada_gem_object * > armada_gem_alloc_private_object(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size) > { > @@ -195,6 +201,8 @@ armada_gem_alloc_private_object(struct drm_device *dev, > size_t size) > if (!obj) > return NULL; > > + obj->obj.funcs = _gem_object_funcs; > + > drm_gem_private_object_init(dev, >obj, size); > > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("alloc private obj %p size %zu\n", obj, size); > @@ -214,6 +222,8 @@ static struct armada_gem_object > *armada_gem_alloc_object(struct drm_device *dev, > if (!obj) > return NULL; > > + obj->obj.funcs = _gem_object_funcs; > + > if (drm_gem_object_init(dev, >obj, size)) { > kfree(obj); > return NULL; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.h > index de04cc2c8f0e..ffcc7e8dd351 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.h > @@ -21,8 +21,6 @@ struct armada_gem_object { > void*update_data; > }; > > -extern const struct vm_operations_struct armada_gem_vm_ops; > - > #define drm_to_armada_gem(o) container_of(o, struct armada_gem_object, obj) > > void armada_gem_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *); > -- > 2.28.0 > > -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last! ___ Freedreno mailing list Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno
Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 1/4] drm/edid: Pass connector to AVI inforframe functions
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 06:13:42PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c > index a7c39f39793f..38c66fbc8276 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c > @@ -849,7 +849,8 @@ tda998x_write_avi(struct tda998x_priv *priv, struct > drm_display_mode *mode) > { > union hdmi_infoframe frame; > > - drm_hdmi_avi_infoframe_from_display_mode(, mode, false); > + drm_hdmi_avi_infoframe_from_display_mode(, > + >connector, mode); > frame.avi.quantization_range = HDMI_QUANTIZATION_RANGE_FULL; > > tda998x_write_if(priv, DIP_IF_FLAGS_IF2, REG_IF2_HB0, ); For this, Acked-by: Russell King Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up ___ Freedreno mailing list Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno
Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH] drm: convert DT component matching to component_match_add_release()
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 07:15:56PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > <li...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 04:39:04PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Russell King > >> <rmk+ker...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: > >> > Convert DT component matching to use component_match_add_release(). > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@armlinux.org.uk> > >> > --- > >> > Can we please get this patch from May merged into the drm-misc or > >> > whatever trees so that we don't end up with conflicts? I've no idea > >> > who looks after drm-misc, as they have _still_ failed to add > >> > themselves to MAINTAINERS. > >> > >> I think Daniel explained pretty clearly why this wasn't happening in > >> the previous thread. > >> > >> Next time you send a v2, can you please mark it as such and include a > >> "Changes in v2" section? > > > > Why - nothing's changed other than a rebase onto 4.9-rc1. This isn't > > a "I've changed it in XYZ way, so here's a new copy". > > > Changes in v2: None > > Is still useful since: > a) the diffstat is different from v1, which necessitates me going > through both versions to see what's changed from the previous reviews > (only to find out myself that it's been rebased and a function has > changed names) Sorry, but I don't track in any fine detail what the changes are between patches when I bring them forward: I have far too many patches to do that (I have 300 right now) and I never know whether they're going to result in a pull request or not. It means finding some way to manually attach a change log to each patch I send out, which will be very time consuming. I'd rather not send patches out than jump through hoops like that, especially when the reason is that the previous version was ignored. > b) in June, you said you were going to roll a new version with the > common OF bits extracted. it's nice to know at the outset that this > has/hasn't happened Now if you were following the rest of it, rather than just random parts that suited you, you'd have noticed that I posted the new version, but that caused more issues, so I publically said I was reverting back to the original version. > Also, prefacing the subject with [PATCH v2] or [PATCH RESEND] lets me > know there is prior history with the change. Reading the previous > version is helpful to see what reviewer's concerns were, and whether > they've been addressed. Yea, I'm very bad at changing the subject line in that way, and I'm getting worse at it. Sorry, I try my best, but I can't do better than that. > > > > It's being > > posted in the hope that someone will finally either comment on it or > > merge the damn thing, rather than ignoring it was done when it was > > last posted. > > > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c | 3 ++- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c| 4 +++- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c | 2 +- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c| 28 > >> > +++-- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c | 5 +++-- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/kirin/kirin_drm_drv.c | 7 --- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 4 +++- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 12 ++- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 6 -- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 5 +++-- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_drv.c | 3 ++- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_external.c| 4 +++- > >> > include/drm/drm_of.h| 12 +++ > >> > 13 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c > >> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c > >> > index fb6a418ce6be..6477d1a65266 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c > >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c > >> > @@ -453,7 +453,8 @@ static int hdlcd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> > return -EAGAIN; > >> > } > >> > > >> > - component_match_add(>dev, , compare_dev, port); > >> > + drm_of_component_match_add(>dev, , compare_dev, > >> > port); > >> > +
Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH] drm: convert DT component matching to component_match_add_release()
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 04:39:04PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Russell King >wrote: > > Convert DT component matching to use component_match_add_release(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > > --- > > Can we please get this patch from May merged into the drm-misc or > > whatever trees so that we don't end up with conflicts? I've no idea > > who looks after drm-misc, as they have _still_ failed to add > > themselves to MAINTAINERS. > > I think Daniel explained pretty clearly why this wasn't happening in > the previous thread. > > Next time you send a v2, can you please mark it as such and include a > "Changes in v2" section? Why - nothing's changed other than a rebase onto 4.9-rc1. This isn't a "I've changed it in XYZ way, so here's a new copy". It's being posted in the hope that someone will finally either comment on it or merge the damn thing, rather than ignoring it was done when it was last posted. > > drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c | 3 ++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c| 4 +++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c | 2 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c| 28 > > +++-- > > drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c | 5 +++-- > > drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/kirin/kirin_drm_drv.c | 7 --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 4 +++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 12 ++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 6 -- > > drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 5 +++-- > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_drv.c | 3 ++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_external.c| 4 +++- > > include/drm/drm_of.h| 12 +++ > > 13 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c > > index fb6a418ce6be..6477d1a65266 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c > > @@ -453,7 +453,8 @@ static int hdlcd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return -EAGAIN; > > } > > > > - component_match_add(>dev, , compare_dev, port); > > + drm_of_component_match_add(>dev, , compare_dev, port); > > + of_node_put(port); > > There's no mention in your commit message about fixing these node leaks. Isn't that kind-of the whole point of this patch? > > > > return component_master_add_with_match(>dev, > > _master_ops, > >match); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c > > index 9280358b8f15..9f4739452a25 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c > > @@ -493,7 +493,9 @@ static int malidp_platform_probe(struct platform_device > > *pdev) > > return -EAGAIN; > > } > > > > - component_match_add(>dev, , malidp_compare_dev, port); > > + drm_of_component_match_add(>dev, , malidp_compare_dev, > > + port); > > + of_node_put(port); > > return component_master_add_with_match(>dev, > > _master_ops, > >match); > > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c > > index 1e0e68f608e4..94e46da9a758 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c > > @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static void armada_add_endpoints(struct device *dev, > > continue; > > } > > > > - component_match_add(dev, match, compare_of, remote); > > + drm_of_component_match_add(dev, match, compare_of, remote); > > of_node_put(remote); > > } > > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > > index bc98bb94264d..47848ed8ca48 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > > @@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ > > #include > > #include > > > > +static void drm_release_of(struct device *dev, void *data) > > +{ > > + of_node_put(data); > > +} > > + > > /** > > * drm_crtc_port_mask - find the mask of a registered CRTC by port OF node > > * @dev: DRM device > > @@ -64,6 +69,24 @@ uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device > > *dev, > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_of_find_possible_crtcs); > > > > /** > > + * drm_of_component_match_add - Add a component helper OF node match rule > > + * @master: master device > > + * @matchptr: component match pointer > > + * @compare: compare function used for matching component > > + * @node: of_node > > + */ > > +void drm_of_component_match_add(struct device *master, > > + struct