On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 06:19:52PM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> On 2018-10-01 13:30, Sean Paul wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:56:47AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> > > On 2018-09-19 11:56, Sean Paul wrote:
> > > > From: Sean Paul
> > > >
> > > > This patch sprinkles a few
On 2018-10-01 13:30, Sean Paul wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:56:47AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
On 2018-09-19 11:56, Sean Paul wrote:
> From: Sean Paul
>
> This patch sprinkles a few async/legacy_cursor_update checks
> through commit to ensure that cursor updates aren't blocked on
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:56:47AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> On 2018-09-19 11:56, Sean Paul wrote:
> > From: Sean Paul
> >
> > This patch sprinkles a few async/legacy_cursor_update checks
> > through commit to ensure that cursor updates aren't blocked on vsync.
> > There are 2 main
On 2018-09-19 11:56, Sean Paul wrote:
From: Sean Paul
This patch sprinkles a few async/legacy_cursor_update checks
through commit to ensure that cursor updates aren't blocked on vsync.
There are 2 main components to this, the first is that we don't want to
wait_for_commit_done in msm_atomic
From: Sean Paul
This patch sprinkles a few async/legacy_cursor_update checks
through commit to ensure that cursor updates aren't blocked on vsync.
There are 2 main components to this, the first is that we don't want to
wait_for_commit_done in msm_atomic before returning from atomic_complete.
