Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 1/4] drm/msm: fix memleak on release

2019-11-12 Thread Sean Paul
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 08:32:07AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 6:01 AM Daniel Vetter  wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:40:01AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:01:46AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > > If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
> > > > > the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
> > > > > and fail to free related resources.
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that the return value from release() is ignored.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to 
> > > > > use the GPU state")
> > > > > Cc: stable  # 4.18
> > > > > Cc: Jordan Crouse 
> > > > > Cc: Rob Clark 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 
> > > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Rob, Sean,
> > > >
> > > > Sending a reminder about this one, which is not yet in linux-next.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps Daniel can pick it up otherwise?
> > >
> > > Another two weeks, another reminder. This one is still not in -next.
> >
> > Well msm is maintained in a separate tree, so the usual group maintainer
> > fallback for when patches are stuck doesn't apply.
> 
> oh, sorry, this wasn't showing up in patchwork.. or rather it did but
> the non-msm related series subject made me overlook it.
> 
> I've already sent a PR, but this shouldn't conflict with anything and
> I think it can go in via drm-misc/fixes
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark 

Thanks for the patch, pushed to drm-misc-next-fixes

Sean

> 
> > Rob, Sean, time to reconsider drm-misc for msm? I think there's some more
> > oddball patches that occasionally get stuck for msm ...
> >
> > Also +Dave.
> > -Daniel
> >
> > >
> > > Johan
> > >
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c 
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > > index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > > @@ -47,12 +47,8 @@ static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, 
> > > > > struct file *file)
> > > > >   struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
> > > > >   struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
> > > > >   struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
> > > > > - int ret;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > > > - if (ret)
> > > > > - return ret;
> > > > >
> > > > > + mutex_lock(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > > >   gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
> > > > >   mutex_unlock(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch

-- 
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
___
Freedreno mailing list
Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno

Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 1/4] drm/msm: fix memleak on release

2019-11-12 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 6:01 AM Daniel Vetter  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:40:01AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:01:46AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
> > > > the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
> > > > and fail to free related resources.
> > > >
> > > > Note that the return value from release() is ignored.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to use 
> > > > the GPU state")
> > > > Cc: stable  # 4.18
> > > > Cc: Jordan Crouse 
> > > > Cc: Rob Clark 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Rob, Sean,
> > >
> > > Sending a reminder about this one, which is not yet in linux-next.
> > >
> > > Perhaps Daniel can pick it up otherwise?
> >
> > Another two weeks, another reminder. This one is still not in -next.
>
> Well msm is maintained in a separate tree, so the usual group maintainer
> fallback for when patches are stuck doesn't apply.

oh, sorry, this wasn't showing up in patchwork.. or rather it did but
the non-msm related series subject made me overlook it.

I've already sent a PR, but this shouldn't conflict with anything and
I think it can go in via drm-misc/fixes

Reviewed-by: Rob Clark 

> Rob, Sean, time to reconsider drm-misc for msm? I think there's some more
> oddball patches that occasionally get stuck for msm ...
>
> Also +Dave.
> -Daniel
>
> >
> > Johan
> >
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c 
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > @@ -47,12 +47,8 @@ static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, 
> > > > struct file *file)
> > > >   struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
> > > >   struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
> > > >   struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
> > > > - int ret;
> > > > -
> > > > - ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > > - if (ret)
> > > > - return ret;
> > > >
> > > > + mutex_lock(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > >   gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
> > > >   mutex_unlock(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Freedreno mailing list
Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno

Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 1/4] drm/msm: fix memleak on release

2019-11-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:40:01AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:01:46AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
> > > the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
> > > and fail to free related resources.
> > > 
> > > Note that the return value from release() is ignored.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to use 
> > > the GPU state")
> > > Cc: stable  # 4.18
> > > Cc: Jordan Crouse 
> > > Cc: Rob Clark 
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 
> > > ---
> > 
> > Rob, Sean,
> > 
> > Sending a reminder about this one, which is not yet in linux-next.
> > 
> > Perhaps Daniel can pick it up otherwise?
> 
> Another two weeks, another reminder. This one is still not in -next.

Well msm is maintained in a separate tree, so the usual group maintainer
fallback for when patches are stuck doesn't apply.

Rob, Sean, time to reconsider drm-misc for msm? I think there's some more
oddball patches that occasionally get stuck for msm ...

Also +Dave.
-Daniel

> 
> Johan
> 
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c 
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > @@ -47,12 +47,8 @@ static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, struct 
> > > file *file)
> > >   struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
> > >   struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
> > >   struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
> > > - int ret;
> > > -
> > > - ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > - if (ret)
> > > - return ret;
> > >  
> > > + mutex_lock(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > >   gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
> > >   mutex_unlock(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Freedreno mailing list
Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno

Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 1/4] drm/msm: fix memleak on release

2019-11-12 Thread Johan Hovold
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:01:46AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
> > the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
> > and fail to free related resources.
> > 
> > Note that the return value from release() is ignored.
> > 
> > Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to use the 
> > GPU state")
> > Cc: stable  # 4.18
> > Cc: Jordan Crouse 
> > Cc: Rob Clark 
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 
> > ---
> 
> Rob, Sean,
> 
> Sending a reminder about this one, which is not yet in linux-next.
> 
> Perhaps Daniel can pick it up otherwise?

Another two weeks, another reminder. This one is still not in -next.

Johan

> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > @@ -47,12 +47,8 @@ static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, struct 
> > file *file)
> > struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
> > struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
> > struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
> > -   int ret;
> > -
> > -   ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > -   if (ret)
> > -   return ret;
> >  
> > +   mutex_lock(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
> > mutex_unlock(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
___
Freedreno mailing list
Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno

Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 1/4] drm/msm: fix memleak on release

2019-10-30 Thread Johan Hovold
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
> the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
> and fail to free related resources.
> 
> Note that the return value from release() is ignored.
> 
> Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to use the 
> GPU state")
> Cc: stable  # 4.18
> Cc: Jordan Crouse 
> Cc: Rob Clark 
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 
> ---

Rob, Sean,

Sending a reminder about this one, which is not yet in linux-next.

Perhaps Daniel can pick it up otherwise?

Thanks,
Johan

>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> @@ -47,12 +47,8 @@ static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, struct 
> file *file)
>   struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
>   struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
>   struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
>  
> + mutex_lock(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
>   gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
>   mutex_unlock(_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
___
Freedreno mailing list
Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno