On 11/10/2014 08:31 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 7.11.2014 v 16:51 Nathaniel McCallum napsal(a):
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4693
Is it good enough to just say No YubiKey found? Would it make sense to log
the original message,
On 11/07/2014 05:14 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 7.11.2014 16:57, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 16:55 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
Fix minimal version of BIND for Fedora 20 and 21.
We should build new mkosek/freeipa COPR package ASAP to solve conflicts on
upgrade.
On (09/11/14 10:09), Martin Kosek wrote:
On 11/08/2014 02:43 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (20/10/14 16:08), Martin Kosek wrote:
On 10/20/2014 04:00 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:58:27PM +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
The plan is to release 4.1 and then 4.0.4. Besides usual
On 11/10/2014 10:09 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (09/11/14 10:09), Martin Kosek wrote:
On 11/08/2014 02:43 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (20/10/14 16:08), Martin Kosek wrote:
On 10/20/2014 04:00 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:58:27PM +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
The
Hi guys,
Some time ago we started managing FreeIPA Copr repos (mkosek/freeipa) with a
target to have the latest greatest FreeIPA available for older arches (read -
RHEL/CentOS) and to allow people using older stable Fedoras (read - Fedora 20)
try FreeIPA 4.0+ releases which brought in several
On 11/10/2014 08:20 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 7.11.2014 v 15:26 David Kupka napsal(a):
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4611
I think you should use MutuallyExclusiveError.
Honza
Thanks, that's the error class I was searching for. Unfortunately, I
didn't know this one so I
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:07:46PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hi guys,
Some time ago we started managing FreeIPA Copr repos (mkosek/freeipa) with a
target to have the latest greatest FreeIPA available for older arches (read -
RHEL/CentOS) and to allow people using older stable Fedoras (read
On 11/10/2014 06:07 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
c) Daily repos Should we deprecate old John's repos
(http://www.freeipa.org/page/Downloads#Bleeding_Edge) which is
difficult to maintain and replace them with Copr ones? I.e. to have
common repo (e.g. mkosek/freeipa-daily) built for the supported
On (10/11/14 07:53), John Dennis wrote:
On 11/10/2014 06:07 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
c) Daily repos Should we deprecate old John's repos
(http://www.freeipa.org/page/Downloads#Bleeding_Edge) which is
difficult to maintain and replace them with Copr ones? I.e. to have
common repo (e.g.
It *is not* possible to merge one COPR repo into another.
It is possible to add another yum repo into build dependencies in COPR
but it usually mean you will need to enable 2nd repo for installation of
freeipa as well.
The script I wrote to manage the IPA repo entire purpose is to pull
This is a fix for: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4668
--
Petr³
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:04:34PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
It *is not* possible to merge one COPR repo into another.
It is possible to add another yum repo into build dependencies in COPR
Ah, right. Adding the build dependencies allows you to add another SRPM,
to be built though..
but
Ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4680
Entry
dn: cn=adtrust agents,cn=sysaccounts,cn=etc,$SUFFIX
must be updated before
dn: cn=ADTrust Agents,cn=privileges,cn=pbac,$SUFFIX
Patch attached
Martin^2
From 0d2e383e080943be82b7edfd9396caef699ab8ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:07:46 +0100
Martin Kosek mko...@redhat.com wrote:
3) Scalability of the approach
Some dependencies are more difficult to maintain than the others.
Especially the PKI ones often required custom Java packaging
(resteasy-base) or a complicated dependency chain (the latest
On 11/10/2014 01:49 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:07:46PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hi guys,
Some time ago we started managing FreeIPA Copr repos (mkosek/freeipa) with a
target to have the latest greatest FreeIPA available for older arches (read -
RHEL/CentOS) and to
On 11/10/2014 04:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:07:46 +0100
Martin Kosek mko...@redhat.com wrote:
3) Scalability of the approach
Some dependencies are more difficult to maintain than the others.
Especially the PKI ones often required custom Java packaging
(resteasy-base)
On 11/10/2014 04:26 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 11/10/2014 01:49 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:07:46PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hi guys,
Some time ago we started managing FreeIPA Copr repos (mkosek/freeipa) with a
target to have the latest greatest FreeIPA available for
Hi,
the attached patch fixes https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4711.
Honza
--
Jan Cholasta
From 5c00f80cce0e0952252df4f7ec3922d71e8f2cc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Cholasta jchol...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:24:22 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fix CA certificate backup and
Hi,
the attached patches provide additional fixes for
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4651.
I'm not 100% sure if the fixes for ipa-sam and ipa-kdb are correct,
please check them carefully.
Honza
--
Jan Cholasta
From a195644143042a0161de81472646f41f503ffe48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
19 matches
Mail list logo
