On 09/17/2012 04:15 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/17/2012 04:04 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/14/2012 09:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 11:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Martin Kosek wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/17/2012 04:04 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/14/2012 09:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 11:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob
On 09/17/2012 04:04 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/14/2012 09:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 11:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Rob Crittenden wrote
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/14/2012 09:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 11:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob
On 09/14/2012 09:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 11:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/05/2012
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 11:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 0
On 09/06/2012 11:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kose
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 17:17 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >> Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >>> Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >> Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/05/2012 08:39 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 0
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 12:42 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
> On 09/06/2012 12:27 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On 09/06/2012 06:13 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> >> On 09/06/2012 10:09 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> On 09/06/2012 06:09 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 06:05 PM, Martin Kosek w
On 09/06/2012 12:27 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:13 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:09 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:09 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:05 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:40 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 09/06/2012 12:13 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:09 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:09 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:05 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
On 09/06/2012 12:13 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:09 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:09 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:05 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:13 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 10:09 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 06:09 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2012 06:05 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Rob Crittenden wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:09 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:09 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:05 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Ro
On 09/06/2012 06:09 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 06:05 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Rob Crittenden wrote
On 09/06/2012 06:05 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/05/2012
On 09/06/2012 05:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 07/05/2012 08:39 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kose
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/05/2012 08:39 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/03/2012 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Deleting a replica can le
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/05/2012 08:39 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/03/2012 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Deleting a replica can leave a replication vecto
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/05/2012 08:39 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/03/2012 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Deleting a replica can leave a replication vector (RUV) on the
other se
On 09/05/2012 08:06 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 07/05/2012 08:39 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 07/03/2012 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Deleting a replica can leave a replication vector (RUV) on the
>> ot
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/05/2012 08:39 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/03/2012 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Deleting a replica can leave a replication vector (RUV) on the
other servers.
This can confuse things if the replica is re-added, and it al
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/05/2012 08:39 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/03/2012 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Deleting a replica can leave a replication vector (RUV) on the other servers.
This can confuse things if the replica is re-added, and it also causes the
server to
On 07/05/2012 08:39 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 07/03/2012 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Deleting a replica can leave a replication vector (RUV) on the other
>>> servers.
>>> This can confuse things if the replica is re-added, and it also causes the
>>> server to ca
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/03/2012 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Deleting a replica can leave a replication vector (RUV) on the other servers.
This can confuse things if the replica is re-added, and it also causes the
server to calculate changes against a server that may no longer exist.
389-d
On 07/03/2012 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Deleting a replica can leave a replication vector (RUV) on the other servers.
> This can confuse things if the replica is re-added, and it also causes the
> server to calculate changes against a server that may no longer exist.
>
> 389-ds-base provid
Deleting a replica can leave a replication vector (RUV) on the other
servers. This can confuse things if the replica is re-added, and it also
causes the server to calculate changes against a server that may no
longer exist.
389-ds-base provides a new task that self-propogates itself to all
av
28 matches
Mail list logo