On 05/30/2013 04:35 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/29/2013 12:25 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2013 03:48 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/28/2013 02:35 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 27 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
We got rid of openldap
On 05/29/2013 12:25 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2013 03:48 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/28/2013 02:35 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 27 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
We got rid of openldap utilities now. While using python.ldap module,
On 05/28/2013 03:48 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/28/2013 02:35 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 27 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
We got rid of openldap utilities now. While using python.ldap module, I
also made the tests much more robust and
On Mon, 27 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
We got rid of openldap utilities now. While using python.ldap
module, I also made the tests much more robust and added a new
test case.
In general patches look fine, there is one small nitpick.
I'll run tests on Monday and then will provide final ACK.
On 05/28/2013 02:35 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 27 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
We got rid of openldap utilities now. While using python.ldap
module, I also made the tests much more robust and added a new
test case.
In general patches look fine, there is one small nitpick.
I'll run
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/28/2013 02:35 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 27 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
We got rid of openldap utilities now. While using
python.ldap module, I also made the tests much more robust
and added a new test case.
In general patches look
On 05/26/2013 08:56 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/20/2013 04:29 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/16/2013 11:16 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
On 05/15/2013 03:41 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
When removing an ID
On 05/20/2013 04:29 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/16/2013 11:16 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
On 05/15/2013 03:41 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
When removing an ID range using idrange-del command, validation
in pre_callback ensures that the range does
On 05/16/2013 11:16 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
On 05/15/2013 03:41 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
When removing an ID range using idrange-del command, validation
in pre_callback ensures that the range does not belong to any
active trust. In such case, ValidationError is raised.
On Mon, 20 May 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/16/2013 11:16 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
On 05/15/2013 03:41 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
When removing an ID range using idrange-del command, validation
in pre_callback ensures that the range does not belong to any
active trust. In such case,
On 05/15/2013 03:41 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
When removing an ID range using idrange-del command, validation
in pre_callback ensures that the range does not belong to any
active trust. In such case, ValidationError is raised.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3615
Tomas
Hi,
When removing an ID range using idrange-del command, validation
in pre_callback ensures that the range does not belong to any
active trust. In such case, ValidationError is raised.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3615
Tomas
From 72a55d498602b5c6cc912eb9585dc860b7fee591 Mon Sep 17
12 matches
Mail list logo
