[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#210][comment] Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation

2017-01-19 Thread MartinBasti
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/210 Title: #210: Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation MartinBasti commented: """ Fixed upstream master: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/changeset/a336de630e9d1ef95a507cc3ee9200c001ab9193

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#210][comment] Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation

2017-01-18 Thread martbab
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/210 Title: #210: Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation martbab commented: """ @gkaihorodova the PR cannot be pushed in current form because the first commit 298e1a136c6a430e8deaa558a946ba51874ffd95 is already pushed to master. So to rebase it

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#210][comment] Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation

2017-01-12 Thread mbasti-rh
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/210 Title: #210: Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation mbasti-rh commented: """ Needs rebase ``` Applying: Unaccessible variable self.attrs in Tracker Patch failed at 0001 Unaccessible variable self.attrs in Tracker The copy of the patch that

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#210][comment] Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation

2016-12-16 Thread stlaz
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/210 Title: #210: Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation stlaz commented: """ I just wanted to remove the ACK till @martbab's comment is worked in so nobody pushes it but I found some minor issues that I would like to see fixed in the rebase as

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#210][comment] Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation

2016-12-15 Thread martbab
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/210 Title: #210: Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation martbab commented: """ Can we get this PR rebased against current master to see whether Travis CI is okay? The current checks are polluted by regression that should be fixed. """ See the

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#210][comment] Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation

2016-12-15 Thread martbab
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/210 Title: #210: Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation martbab commented: """ Can we get this PR rebased against current master to see whether Travis CI is okay. The current checks are polluted by regression that should be fixed. """ See the

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#210][comment] Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation

2016-12-12 Thread martbab
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/210 Title: #210: Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation martbab commented: """ Bump for review. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/210#issuecomment-266418295 -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#210][comment] Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation

2016-11-13 Thread mirielka
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/210 Title: #210: Tests: Stage User Tracker implementation mirielka commented: """ Review notes: same as in https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/181 """ See the full comment at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/210#issuecomment-260255679 --